Do Big 4 Auditors Enhance Audit Quality in China? A "Behind the Scenes Look"

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Songsheng [1 ]
Krishnan, Gopal, V [2 ]
Li, Wenying [3 ]
Zhang, Yinqi [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Dept Accounting, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Bentley Univ, Dept Accountancy, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Accounting, Dept Auditing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Amer Univ, Kogod Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Taxat, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Big; 4; auditors; pre-audit earnings quality; audit quality; audit adjustments; MARKET CONCENTRATION; INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INVESTOR PROTECTION; AGENCY COSTS; FIRM; CHOICE; INDEPENDENCE; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.2308/JIAR-2020-056
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We contribute to the debate on whether the ''Big N effect'' on audit quality is due to client self-selection by controlling for pre-audit earnings quality. Using data from the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants, we find that pre-audit earnings quality is higher for Big 4 clients. Controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, restatement frequency is lower for Big 4 clients than for non-Big 4 clients, but there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between Big 4 and non-Big 4 clients. Our findings indicate that Big 4 and non -Big 4 auditors in China pursue different strategies to enhance audit quality. The Big 4 enhance audit quality by recruiting and retaining clients with higher earnings quality and acting more conservatively toward clients with a higher risk for earnings restatement. In contrast, non-Big 4 auditors enhance audit quality by requiring more downward audit adjustments.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 56
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions
    Hardies, Kris
    Breesch, Diane
    Branson, Joel
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 25 (01) : 7 - 34
  • [42] -Competition Effects on Audit Quality and Pricing in a Non-Big 4 Market-
    Azizkhani, Masoud
    Sami, Heibatollah
    Amirkhani, Kourosh
    Monroe, Gary S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2022, 57 (04):
  • [43] Air pollution, auditors' pessimistic bias and audit quality: evidence from China
    Chen, Huangyue
    Tan, Xiaoping
    Cao, Qun
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (01) : 74 - 104
  • [44] Key audit matters and big4 auditors in Oman: a quantile approach analysis
    Baatwah, Saeed Rabea
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2023, 21 (05) : 1124 - 1148
  • [45] Big 4 fee premium and audit quality: latest evidence from UK listed companies
    Campa, Domenico
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2013, 28 (08) : 680 - +
  • [46] The Impact of Partners' Economic Incentives on Audit Quality in Big 4 Partnerships
    Dekeyser, Simon
    Gaeremynck, Ann
    Knechel, W. Robert
    Willekens, Marleen
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (06) : 129 - 152
  • [47] The role of the Big 4 and second-tier international networks in redeveloping China's audit market
    Lento, Camillo
    Yeung, Wing Him
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (01) : 40 - 71
  • [48] Do industry specialist auditors enhance accounting quality in the EU? Evidence from the pre-IFRS and mandatory post-IFRS periods
    Lopez, Dennis M.
    Schuldt, Michael A.
    Vega, Jose G.
    ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2022, 30 (04) : 398 - 431
  • [49] The Effect of China's Weak Institutional Environment on the Quality of Big 4 Audits
    Ke, Bin
    Lennox, Clive S.
    Xin, Qingquan
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (04) : 1591 - 1619
  • [50] Do major public emergencies affect audit quality? -Evidence from China
    Zhu, Lei
    Xie, Liufang
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,