Do Big 4 Auditors Enhance Audit Quality in China? A "Behind the Scenes Look"

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Songsheng [1 ]
Krishnan, Gopal, V [2 ]
Li, Wenying [3 ]
Zhang, Yinqi [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Dept Accounting, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Bentley Univ, Dept Accountancy, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Accounting, Dept Auditing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Amer Univ, Kogod Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Taxat, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Big; 4; auditors; pre-audit earnings quality; audit quality; audit adjustments; MARKET CONCENTRATION; INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INVESTOR PROTECTION; AGENCY COSTS; FIRM; CHOICE; INDEPENDENCE; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.2308/JIAR-2020-056
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We contribute to the debate on whether the ''Big N effect'' on audit quality is due to client self-selection by controlling for pre-audit earnings quality. Using data from the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants, we find that pre-audit earnings quality is higher for Big 4 clients. Controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, restatement frequency is lower for Big 4 clients than for non-Big 4 clients, but there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between Big 4 and non-Big 4 clients. Our findings indicate that Big 4 and non -Big 4 auditors in China pursue different strategies to enhance audit quality. The Big 4 enhance audit quality by recruiting and retaining clients with higher earnings quality and acting more conservatively toward clients with a higher risk for earnings restatement. In contrast, non-Big 4 auditors enhance audit quality by requiring more downward audit adjustments.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 56
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors' perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland
    Rautiainen, Antti
    Saastamoinen, Jani
    Pajunen, Kati
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (03) : 386 - 404
  • [12] Do social ties between individual auditors and client CEOs/CFOs matter to audit quality?
    Qi, Baolei
    Yang, Rong
    Tian, Gaoliang
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2017, 24 (3-4) : 440 - 463
  • [13] The Effects of Industry Specialist Engagement Signing Auditors and Review Signing Auditors on Audit Fees and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Song, Zilong
    Yu, Yumiao
    Zhan, Jun
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2023, 22 (03) : 63 - 84
  • [14] Do Shared Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from Banking Relationships
    Ton, Karen
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 98 (01) : 423 - 451
  • [15] Do Philanthropic Auditors Provide Higher-Quality Audit Services? Evidence From China
    Li, Dan
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Zhang, Keyuan
    Zhang, Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2022, 57 (03):
  • [16] Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China
    Athavale, Manoj
    Guo, Zhaorui
    Meng, Yun
    Zhang, Tianshu
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 78 : 554 - 571
  • [17] Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality
    Francis, Jere R.
    Yu, Michael D.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2009, 84 (05) : 1521 - 1552
  • [18] U.S. Big 4 and Local Auditors in the China Initial Public Offering Market
    Feng, Zhi-Yuan
    Huang, Hua-Wei
    Dao, Mai
    REVIEW OF PACIFIC BASIN FINANCIAL MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2019, 22 (04)
  • [19] Effect of international working experience of individual auditors on audit quality: Evidence from China
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Dai, Yunhao
    Kong, Dongmin
    Tan, Weiqiang
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2017, 44 (7-8) : 1073 - 1108
  • [20] Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality?
    He, Xianjie
    Pittman, Jeffrey A.
    Rui, Oliver M.
    Wu, Donghui
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (05) : 61 - 87