Other Preventive Anti-Migraine Treatments: ACE Inhibitors, ARBs, Calcium Channel Blockers, Serotonin Antagonists, and NMDA Receptor Antagonists

被引:27
作者
Rau, Jill C. [1 ]
Dodick, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
Migraine; Adult; Prevention; Medications; CORTICAL SPREADING DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT; MIGRAINE PROPHYLAXIS; FLUNARIZINE SIBELIUM; HEADACHE PROPHYLAXIS; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; CHILDHOOD MIGRAINE; MULTICENTER TRIAL; AMERICAN ACADEMY;
D O I
10.1007/s11940-019-0559-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of reviewMigraine causes more years of life lived with disability than almost any other condition in the world and can significantly impact the lives of individuals with migraine, their families, and society. The use of medication for the prevention of migraine is an integral component to reducing disability caused by migraine. There are many different drug classes that have been investigated and shown efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. This article examines several of the classes of medications that are used for migraine preventive treatment, specifically, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, serotonin antagonists, alpha-adrenergic agonists, and N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor antagonists.Recent findingsThere have been randomized control trials investigating medications in these drug classes since the most recent guidelines for migraine prevention in adults were published by the American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, and the Canadian Headache Society. In these investigations, enalapril, candesartan, and memantine all demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention. The evidence for these and the aforementioned drug classes are reviewed.SummaryWhen oral medications are being selected for migraine prevention, comorbid and coexistent medical conditions, concomitant medications, patient preference, and pregnancy and breast-feeding plans should be considered. Within the drug classes discussed, memantine and candesartan have a moderate level of evidence for efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Adam E I, 1978, J R Coll Gen Pract, V28, P587
[2]   NIFEDIPINE VERSUS PROPRANOLOL FOR THE INITIAL PROPHYLAXIS OF MIGRAINE [J].
ALBERS, GW ;
SIMON, LT ;
HAMIK, A ;
PEROUTKA, SJ .
HEADACHE, 1989, 29 (04) :215-218
[3]  
ALDEEB SM, 1992, HEADACHE, V32, P461
[4]   INTERACTION OF FLUNARIZINE WITH DOPAMINE D2 AND D1 RECEPTORS [J].
AMBROSIO, C ;
STEFANINI, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 197 (2-3) :221-223
[5]   What does the evidence show? Efficacy of behavioural treatments for recurrent headaches in adults [J].
Andrasik, F. .
NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 28 (Suppl 2) :S70-S77
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Headache, V29, P639
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1992, HEADACHE Q-CURR TREA
[9]   NIMODIPINE IN MIGRAINE PROPHYLAXIS [J].
ANSELL, E ;
FAZZONE, T ;
FESTENSTEIN, R ;
JOHNSON, ES ;
THAVAPALAN, M ;
WILKINSON, M ;
WOZNIAK, I .
CEPHALALGIA, 1988, 8 (04) :269-272
[10]   COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF PRINDOLOL, CLONIDINE AND CARBAMAZEPINE IN INTERVAL THERAPY OF MIGRAINE [J].
ANTHONY, M ;
SOMERVILLE, B ;
LANCE, JW .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1972, 1 (26) :1343-+