IBED: Combining IBEA and DE for optimal feature selection in software product line engineering

被引:31
作者
Xue, Yinxing [1 ]
Zhong, Jinghui [1 ,2 ]
Tian Huat Tan [3 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Cai, Wentong [1 ]
Chen, Manman [3 ]
Sun, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Eng, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Singapore Univ Technol & Design, 8 Somapah Rd, Singapore 487372, Singapore
关键词
Optimal feature selection; Indicator-based evolutionary algorithm (IBEA); Differential evolutionary algorithm (DE); Software product line engineering; GENETIC ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.040
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Software configuration, which aims to customize the software for different users (e.g., Linux kernel configuration), is an important and complicated task. In software product line engineering (SPLE), feature oriented domain analysis is adopted and feature model is used to guide the configuration of new product variants. In SPLE, product configuration is an optimal feature selection problem, which needs to find a set of features that have no conflicts and meanwhile achieve multiple design objectives (e.g., minimizing cost and maximizing the number of features). In previous studies, several multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) were used for the optimal feature selection problem and indicator-based evolutionary algorithm (IBEA) was proven to be the best MOEA for this problem. However, IBEA still suffers from the issues of correctness and diversity of found solutions. In this paper, we propose a dual-population evolutionary algorithm, named IBED, to achieve both correctness and diversity of solutions. In IBED, two populations are individually evolved with two different types of evolutionary operators, i.e., IBEA operators and differential evolution (DE) operators. Furthermore, we propose two enhancement techniques for existing MOEAs, namely the feedback-directed mechanism to fast find the correct solutions (e.g., solutions that satisfy the feature model constraints) and the preprocessing method to reduce the search space. Our empirical results have shown that IBED with the enhancement techniques can outperform several state-of-the-art MOEAs on most case studies in terms of correctness and diversity of found solutions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1231
页数:17
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INTRO DIFFERENTIAL E
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, P 2015 INT S SOFTWAR, DOI DOI 10.1145/2771783.2771808
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications
  • [4] An Overview of Feature-Oriented Software Development
    Apel, Sven
    Kaestner, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 8 (05): : 49 - 84
  • [5] ARCURI A, 2011, ICSE, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/1985793.1985795
  • [6] Batory D, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3714, P7
  • [7] Benavides D, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3520, P491
  • [8] Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review
    Benavides, David
    Segura, Sergio
    Ruiz-Cortes, Antonio
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 35 (06) : 615 - 636
  • [9] Berger T., 2012, TECH REP
  • [10] Variability mechanisms in software ecosystems
    Berger, Thorsten
    Pfeiffer, Rolf-Helge
    Tartler, Reinhard
    Dienst, Steffen
    Czarnecki, Krzysztof
    Wasowski, Andrzej
    She, Steven
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 56 (11) : 1520 - 1535