Structural health monitoring of bonded composite repairs - A critical comparison between ultrasonic Lamb wave approach and surface mounted crack sensor approach

被引:34
作者
Habib, F. [1 ]
Martinez, M. [2 ]
Artemev, A. [1 ]
Brothers, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Natl Res Council Canada, Inst Aerosp Res, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
Debonding; Ultrasonics; Mechanical testing; Non-destructive testing; INSPECTION; AIRCRAFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.11.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of the Lamb waves Acoustic-Ultrasound Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) technique for the determination of the adhesive joint failure was evaluated and compared to that of another SHM technique: Surface Mountable Crack Sensor (SMCS). A commercially available Acoustic-Ultrasound system was used. The SMCS consists of a "hot spot" monitoring system based on a three-layer electrically insulating and conductive paint. An electrical signal is used as a boolean operator for the characterization of the passage of damage through the sensor and the underlying material. The coupons consisted of carbon fiber substrates with boron patches bonded to them. The advantages and disadvantages of both techniques are discussed. It has been demonstrated that the Lamb waves Acoustic-Ultrasound technique possesses the capability to identify and quantify damage in a bonded repair. The SMCS proved to be a successful SHM technique for the monitoring of the formation of a disbond at the edges of the patch. All results were validated using the C-Scan ultrasound method. Crown Copyright (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alleyne David N, 1992, NDT&E INT, V25, P11, DOI [10.1016/0963-8695(92)90003-Y, DOI 10.1016/0963-8695(92)90003-Y]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AEROSPACE STANDA JUN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Aerospace Standards Newsletter, V2, Patent No. 8059008
[4]   Development of life extension strategies for Australian military aircraft, using structural health monitoring of composite repairs and joints [J].
Baker, W ;
Mckenzie, I ;
Jones, R .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2004, 66 (1-4) :133-143
[5]   Finite element modeling to determine thermal residual strain distribution of bonded composite repairs for structural health monitoring design. [J].
Baker, W ;
Jones, R ;
Davis, C ;
Galea, S .
SMART MATERIALS II, 2002, 4934 :128-139
[6]  
Banerjee S, 2010, P SPIE INT SOC OPT 1, V7650
[7]   Composite bond inspection [J].
Crane, Robert Lee ;
Dillingham, Giles .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2008, 43 (20) :6682-6694
[8]   In situ health monitoring of bonded composite repairs using a novel fibre Bragg grating sensing arrangement. [J].
Davis, C ;
Baker, W ;
Moss, S ;
Galea, S ;
Jones, R .
SMART MATERIALS II, 2002, 4934 :140-149
[9]   Inspection of composite and metal adhesive bonds with an electrochemical sensor [J].
Davis, GD ;
Thayer, K ;
Rich, MJ ;
Drzal, LT .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (10) :1307-1326
[10]   Development of structural health monitoring systems for composite bonded repairs on aircraft structures [J].
Galea, SC ;
Powlesland, IG ;
Moss, SD ;
Konak, M ;
van der Velden, S ;
Stade, B ;
Baker, AA .
SMART STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS 2001: SMART STRUCTURES AND INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, 2001, 4327 :246-257