Best-worst scaling: An introduction and initial comparison with monadic rating for preference elicitation with food products

被引:94
作者
Jaeger, Sara R. [1 ]
Jorgensen, Anne S. [2 ]
Aaslyng, Margit D. [3 ]
Bredie, Wender L. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] HortResearch, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, Dept Food Sci, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[3] Danish Meat Res Inst, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
maximum difference scaling; discrete choice experiment; unstructured bi-polar line scale; research methodology; preference mapping; pork; young adults; Denmark;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.03.002
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This paper introduces the use of best-worst scaling to elicit taste-based preferences and presents a comparison of this scaling methodology with monadic preference ratings elicited on an unstructured line scale. Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a discrete choice task that forces respondents to make a discriminating choice among the samples under investigation by requiring them to select both the best and the worst option in an available (sub)set of samples. In an empirical case study that concerns consumer preferences for minced pork patties, it is found that the results from the two methods are highly correlated. However, there is some evidence to suggest that preference data elicited using best-worst scaling may better enable discovery of differences in sample preferences without being a more difficult test for consumers to take part in. Some of the advantages and disadvantages associated with the application of best-worst scaling in hedonic measurement are noted and discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条