Best-worst scaling: An introduction and initial comparison with monadic rating for preference elicitation with food products

被引:94
作者
Jaeger, Sara R. [1 ]
Jorgensen, Anne S. [2 ]
Aaslyng, Margit D. [3 ]
Bredie, Wender L. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] HortResearch, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, Dept Food Sci, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[3] Danish Meat Res Inst, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
maximum difference scaling; discrete choice experiment; unstructured bi-polar line scale; research methodology; preference mapping; pork; young adults; Denmark;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.03.002
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This paper introduces the use of best-worst scaling to elicit taste-based preferences and presents a comparison of this scaling methodology with monadic preference ratings elicited on an unstructured line scale. Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a discrete choice task that forces respondents to make a discriminating choice among the samples under investigation by requiring them to select both the best and the worst option in an available (sub)set of samples. In an empirical case study that concerns consumer preferences for minced pork patties, it is found that the results from the two methods are highly correlated. However, there is some evidence to suggest that preference data elicited using best-worst scaling may better enable discovery of differences in sample preferences without being a more difficult test for consumers to take part in. Some of the advantages and disadvantages associated with the application of best-worst scaling in hedonic measurement are noted and discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure
    Aaslyng, MD
    Bejerholm, C
    Ertbjerg, P
    Bertram, HC
    Andersen, HJ
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (04) : 277 - 288
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1986, Colorimetry, V2nd
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, 858611993 ISO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, ISO 13299:2003 Sensory analysis - Methodology-General guidance for establishing a sensory profile
  • [5] *ASTM, 1992, ASTM MANUAL SERIES
  • [6] Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries
    Auger, Pat
    Devinney, Timothy M.
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (03) : 299 - 326
  • [7] The influence of cooking technique and core temperature on results of a sensory analysis of pork - depending on the raw meat quality
    Bejerholm, C
    Aaslyng, MD
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2004, 15 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [8] An experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations
    Bleichrodt, H
    Johannesson, M
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (02) : 208 - 216
  • [9] Predicting paired preferences from sensory data
    Buck, D
    Wakeling, I
    Greenhoff, K
    Hasted, A
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2001, 12 (5-7) : 481 - 487
  • [10] THE EFFICIENT ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR COGNITION
    CACIOPPO, JT
    PETTY, RE
    KAO, CF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1984, 48 (03) : 306 - 307