Eco-Driving from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: Implications for Supporting User-Energy Interaction

被引:2
作者
Arend, Matthias G. [1 ]
Franke, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Psychol, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Lubeck, Inst Multimedia & Interact Syst, Engn Psychol & Cognit Ergon, Lubeck, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ERGONOMICS ASSOCIATION (IEA 2018), VOL 8: ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORS IN MANUFACTURING, AGRICULTURE, BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND MINING | 2019年 / 825卷
关键词
Eco-driving; User-energy interaction; Behavioral economics; Heuristics; Biases; TIME-SAVING BIAS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; DECISIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; CHOICES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-96068-5_95
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Eco-driving can essentially be regarded as driver behavior targeted towards increased energy efficiency. As such, eco-drivers have an impact on fuel efficiency when selecting a vehicle (strategic eco-driving), selecting routes (tactical eco-driving) as well as selecting eco-driving strategies (operational eco-driving). On the operational level, a key task for electric vehicle drivers is to decide how to control and interact with the system-inherent energy flows (i.e., user-energy interaction). With the control of the energy flows, drivers convert energies into each other with the goal of achieving optimal energy efficiency. Consequently, user-energy interaction can be regarded as a regulation of energy resources that is composed of a series of economic decisions. Therefore, we examine economic decision-making as a framework for understanding drivers' eco-driving decisions on the strategic, tactical and operational level of ecodriving. So far economic decision-making has been most extensively studied with the resource money creating a whole research discipline, namely behavioral economics. A plethora of research has indicated that humans tend to use heuristics and succumb to fallacies when making economic decisions. Therefore, we describe heuristics and biases that have been identified for driver behavior and that are relevant to eco-driving. Based on these, we discuss possible implications of the behavioral economics perspective for user-energy interaction. Opportunities to support drivers' user-energy interaction on the levels of eco-driving and directions for future research are highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 895
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The Role of Interaction Patterns with Hybrid Electric Vehicle Eco-Features for Drivers' Eco-Driving Performance
    Arend, Matthias G.
    Franke, Thomas
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2017, 59 (02) : 314 - 327
  • [2] Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative
    Barkenbus, Jack N.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (02) : 762 - 769
  • [3] Methods of evaluating electric vehicles from a user's perspective - the MINI E field trial in Berlin
    Cocron, P.
    Buehler, F.
    Neumann, I.
    Franke, T.
    Krems, J. F.
    Schwalm, M.
    Keinath, A.
    [J]. IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 5 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [4] Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure
    Davis, Steven J.
    Caldeira, Ken
    Matthews, H. Damon
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5997) : 1330 - 1333
  • [5] The emergence of an electric mobility trajectory
    Dijk, Marc
    Orsato, Renato J.
    Kemp, Rene
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 : 135 - 145
  • [6] Eriksson G, 2013, P HUM FACT ERG SOC E
  • [7] Eriksson G, 2013, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V8, P492
  • [8] How Do Hybrid Electric Vehicle Drivers Acquire Ecodriving Strategy Knowledge?
    Franke, Thomas
    Arend, Matthias G.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS: COGNITION AND DESIGN, EPCE 2017, PT II, 2017, 10276 : 363 - 374
  • [9] Ecodriving in hybrid electric vehicles - Exploring challenges for user-energy interaction
    Franke, Thomas
    Arend, Matthias Georg
    McIlroy, Rich C.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 55 : 33 - 45
  • [10] CHOICES, VALUES, AND FRAMES
    KAHNEMAN, D
    TVERSKY, A
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (04) : 341 - 350