Writing Summaries to Learn in Compulsory and Post-compulsory Secondary Education

被引:0
作者
Gracia Garcia, Marta [1 ]
Castells Gomez, Nuria [1 ]
Espino Datsira, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Psicol Evolut & Educ, Fac Psicol, Barcelona 08035, Spain
来源
REVISTA DE EDUCACION | 2012年 / 358期
关键词
Secondary Education; Higher Education; content area reading and writing; reading and writing procedures; cognitive and metacognitive operations; summarizing; TEXT;
D O I
10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-358-085
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to analyse the procedures and the metacognitive and cognitive operations that Secondary and Higher Education students carried out as they performed a summary in order to learn. We also analysed the characteristics of the written products and identified the relations between the different variables. The research employed a multiple-case study methodology, with 24 students belonging to the same school (12 secondary education students, 12 higher education students). Data collection about the process of writing the summary consisted of asking the students to think aloud as they read and wrote to access their comprehension and composition processes. We examined the reading and writing procedures employed during the elaboration of the summary (re-reading, taking notes, writing a draft). The analysis of the thinking-aloud protocols allowed us to identify the metacognitive and cognitive operations. The summaries were also categorised. The results show significant differences between the procedures and the cognitive and metacognitive operations carried out by the students from the different educational levels. There are neither significant differences between levels related to the quality of the summaries, nor between the quality and the procedures and operations employed.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 449
页数:24
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EVALUACION EDUCACION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, L1EDUCATIONAL STUDIE
[3]  
BROWN A, 1981, J EDUC RES, V10, P14
[4]  
BROWN AL, 1983, CHILD DEV, V54, P968, DOI 10.2307/1129901
[5]  
CHI MTH, 1994, COGNITIVE SCI, V18, P439, DOI 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7
[6]  
Coll C., 2007, Revista Innovacion Educativa, V161, P34
[7]   Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation [J].
Cote, N ;
Goldman, SR ;
Saul, EU .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1998, 25 (01) :1-53
[8]  
Ericsson K. A., 1993, Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data
[9]  
Gonzalez Nieto L., 2002, EVALUACION EDUCACION, P179
[10]   Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text:: Evidence from eye fixation patterns [J].
Hyönä, J ;
Lorch, RF ;
Kaakinen, JK .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 94 (01) :44-55