Developmental Alcohol-Specific Parenting Profiles in Adolescence and their Relationships with Adolescents' Alcohol Use

被引:49
作者
Koning, Ina M. [1 ,2 ]
van den Eijnden, Regina J. J. M. [1 ]
Verdurmen, Jacqueline E. E. [2 ]
Engels, Rutger C. M. E. [3 ]
Vollebergh, Wilma A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Interdisciplinary Social Sci, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Alcohol-specific parenting; Adolescents; Parenting profiles; Alcohol use; Longitudinal; Communication; SUBSTANCE USE; STUDENT INTERVENTION; DRINKING; COMMUNICATION; SOCIALIZATION; ASSOCIATION; DISCLOSURE; BEHAVIORS; RULES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10964-012-9772-9
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Previous studies on general parenting have demonstrated the relevance of strict parenting within a supportive social context for a variety of adolescent behaviors, such as alcohol use. Yet, alcohol-specific parenting practices are generally examined as separate predictors of adolescents' drinking behavior. The present study examined different developmental profiles of alcohol-specific parenting (rule-setting, quality and frequency of communication about alcohol use) and how these patterns relate to the initiation and growth of adolescents' drinking. A longitudinal sample of 883 adolescents (47 % female) including four measurements (between ages 12 and 16) was used. Latent class growth analysis revealed that five classes of parenting could be distinguished. Communication about alcohol appeared to be fairly stable over time in all parenting classes, whereas the level of rule-setting declined in all subgroups of parents as adolescents grow older. Strict rule-setting in combination with a high quality and frequency of communication was associated with the lowest amount of drinking; parents scoring low on all these behaviors show to be related to the highest amount of drinking. This study showed that alcohol-specific rule-setting is most effective when it coincides with a good quality and frequency of communication about alcohol use. This indicates that alcohol-specific parenting behaviors should be taken into account as an alcohol-specific parenting context, rather than single parenting practices. Therefore, parent-based alcohol interventions should not only encourage strict rule setting, the way parents communicate with their child about alcohol is also of major importance.
引用
收藏
页码:1502 / 1511
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   How important are parents during the college years?: A longitudinal perspective of indirect influences parents yield on their college teens' alcohol use [J].
Abar, Caitlin ;
Turrisi, Robert .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2008, 33 (10) :1360-1368
[2]   Parent-teen communication and pre-college alcohol involvement: A latent class analysis [J].
Abar, Caitlin C. ;
Fernandez, Anne C. ;
Wood, Mark D. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2011, 36 (12) :1357-1360
[3]   Adolescents' perceived parenting styles and their substance use: Concurrent and longitudinal analyses [J].
Adalbjarnardottir, S ;
Hafsteinsson, LG .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE, 2001, 11 (04) :401-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], JEUGD RISKANT GEDRAG
[5]  
BAUMRIND D, 1968, ADOLESCENCE, V3, P255
[6]   Transitions from first substance use to substance use disorders in adolescence: Is early onset associated with a rapid escalation? [J].
Behrendt, S. ;
Wittchen, H. -U. ;
Hoefler, M. ;
Lieb, R. ;
Beesdo, K. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2009, 99 (1-3) :68-78
[7]   Adolescence and the trajectory of alcohol use: Basic to clinical studies [J].
Brown, SA ;
Tapert, SF .
ADOLESCENT BRAIN DEVELOPMENT: VULNERABILITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2004, 1021 :234-244
[8]  
Brown T.A., 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd
[9]  
CBS:Statistics Netherlands, 2011, BEV 1 KWART 2011
[10]   Trajectories of parenting processes and adolescent substance use: Reciprocal effects [J].
Coley, Rebekah Levine ;
Votruba-Drzal, Elizabeth ;
Schindler, Holly S. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (04) :613-625