Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty

被引:69
作者
Ivlev, Ilya [1 ]
Vacek, Jakub [1 ]
Kneppo, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Tech Univ, Dept Biomed Technol, Kladno 27201, Czech Republic
关键词
OR in health services; Health technology assessment (HTA); Magnetic resonance imager (MRI); Purchasing; Forecasting; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT HTA; HEALTH; INFRASTRUCTURE; OPPORTUNITIES; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; SYSTEM; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.075
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Innovative approaches to the assessment and management of medical technologies use a combination of health technology assessment (HTA) and operations research methods, specifically multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The purpose of this article is to develop methodological support and provide a theoretical justification for decision support in the selection of medical devices under conditions of uncertainty, using MRI systems as an example. The goal of the method application has been formulated as follows: determine a ranked list of MRI systems for contributory health organisations administered by regional authorities (regional hospitals) in the Czech Republic. An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Delphi method were used to identify experts' preferences and for consensus building. The expert group was selected based on eight complex-valued criteria, and each expert was given a weighting factor. A set of 13 MRI systems and the 14 key default specifications that play the most important roles when hospitals select MRIs for purchase were defined. Strong conformity (W >= 0.6, p < 0.05) within the experts' judgments was revealed. A prediction regarding alternatives, weights and changes in priority vectors over the,following 8 years has been provided. The developed approach is useful in decision support when selecting medical devices under conditions of uncertainty by hospitals. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO) within the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 228
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Angelo Anthony, 2009, Biomed Instrum Technol, V43, P211, DOI 10.2345/0899-8205-43.3.211
[2]   Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry [J].
Anojkumar, L. ;
Ilangkumaran, M. ;
Sasirekha, V. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (06) :2964-2980
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EXPERT CHOICE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
[5]   Whatever works: Uncertainty and technological hybrids in medical innovation [J].
Barbera-Tomas, David ;
Consoli, Davide .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (05) :932-948
[6]   A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process [J].
Barker, Theresa J. ;
Zabinsky, Zelda B. .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (05) :558-573
[7]   A regulatory governance perspective on health technology assessment (HTA) in France: The contextual mediation of common functional pressures [J].
Barron, Anthony J. G. ;
Klinger, Corinna ;
Shah, Sara Mehmood Birchall ;
Wright, John S. F. .
HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (02) :137-146
[8]   A bipolar consensus approach for group decision making problems [J].
Bouzarour-Amokrane, Yasmina ;
Tchangani, Ayeley ;
Peres, Francois .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (03) :1759-1772
[9]   Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions [J].
Brunelli, Matteo ;
Fedrizzi, Michele .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 240 (03) :765-773
[10]  
Chakravarty A, 2008, Med J Armed Forces India, V64, P46, DOI 10.1016/S0377-1237(08)80146-3