Accuracy of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Detection in Exhaled Breath Compared to Reverse-transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for Diagnosis of COVID-19: An Evidence-based Case Report

被引:1
作者
Susanto, Agus Dwi [1 ,2 ]
Agustin, Heidy [1 ,2 ]
Taufik, Muhammad [3 ]
Rahman, Mohammad Azizur [4 ]
Hidayat, Moulid [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Natl Resp Referral Hosp Persahabatan, Fac Med, Dept Pulmonol & Resp Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Indonesian Soc Respirol, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Dhaka, Fac Med, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[5] Univ Mataram, Fac Med, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
来源
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2022年 / 17卷 / 05期
关键词
Volatile Organic Compound; Exhaled Breath; COVID-19; Polymerase Chain Reaction;
D O I
10.5812/archcid-119263
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The World Health Organization (WHO) declared this infection a global pandemic in 2020. In addition, various methods have been developed to diagnose COVID-19 rapidly and accurately to reverse transcription-polymerase chain re-action (RT-PCR) as a gold standard method. One of these methods is the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in exhaled breath. Objectives: The aim was to collect and investigate studies on the accuracy of VOC detection as a diagnostic method for COVID-19. Methods: A literature search was performed in five electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, EBSCO-host, and Scopus, along with hand searching. The search was conducted in the titles and abstracts of articles using keywords and their equivalent terms, combined with the Boolean operators (OR and AND). The search results were then selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and compatibility with the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) framework. Results: Based on the search results, two cross-sectional studies by Wintjens et al. and Ruszkiewicz et al. were selected, which were then critically appraised. Both studies showed good validity. Wintjens et al. reported 86% sensitivity and 54% specificity for their method, with a positive predictive value (PPV) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 40% and 92%, respectively. Besides, Ruszkiewicz et al., who conducted a study in two different locations, reported 82.4% sensitivity and 75% specificity for their method in Edinburgh (UK), with PPV and NPV of 87.5% and 66.7%, respectively, while they reported 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity in Dortmund (Germany), with PPV and NPV of 45% and 97.8%, respectively. The accuracy of these three methods was 62%, 80%, and 82%, respectively. Conclusions: Detection of VOCs from exhaled breath can be a rapid, cost-effective, and simple method for diagnosing COVID-19. However, the accuracy of this method is still relatively low (62 -82%) and inconsistent; therefore, it is only recommended for screen-ing.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds of Infection: A Systematic Review [J].
Ahmed, Waqar M. ;
Lawal, Oluwasola ;
Nilsen, Tamara M. ;
Goodacre, Royston ;
Fowler, Stephen J. .
ACS INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 3 (10) :695-710
[2]   Evaluation of current diagnostic methods for COVID-19 [J].
Alpdagtas, Saadet ;
Ilhan, Elif ;
Uysal, Ebru ;
Sengor, Mustafa ;
Ustundag, Cem Bulent ;
Gunduz, Oguzhan .
APL BIOENGINEERING, 2020, 4 (04)
[3]   Breath Biopsy and Discovery of Exclusive Volatile Organic Compounds for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases [J].
Belizario, Jose E. ;
Faintuch, Joel ;
Malpartida, Miguel Garay .
FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 10
[4]   Diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome by exhaled breath analysis [J].
Bos, Lieuwe D. J. .
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (02)
[5]   Synergy between nanomaterials and volatile organic compounds for non-invasive medical evaluation [J].
Broza, Yoav Y. ;
Vishinkin, Rotem ;
Barash, Orna ;
Nakhleh, Morad K. ;
Haick, Hossam .
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2018, 47 (13) :4781-4859
[6]  
Chen H, 2020, medRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2020.06.21.20136523, 10.1101/2020.06.21.20136523, DOI 10.1101/2020.06.21.20136523]
[7]   Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) Current Status and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review [J].
Di Gennaro, Francesco ;
Pizzol, Damiano ;
Marotta, Claudia ;
Antunes, Mario ;
Racalbuto, Vincenzo ;
Veronese, Nicola ;
Smith, Lee .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
[8]   Detecting COVID-19 from Breath: A Game Changer for a Big Challenge [J].
Giovannini, Giorgia ;
Haick, Hossam ;
Garoli, Denis .
ACS SENSORS, 2021, 6 (04) :1408-1417
[9]   Metabolomics of exhaled breath in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A pilot study [J].
Grassin-Delyle, Stanislas ;
Roquencourt, Camille ;
Moine, Pierre ;
Saffroy, Gabriel ;
Carn, Stanislas ;
Heming, Nicholas ;
Fleuriet, Jerome ;
Salvator, Helene ;
Naline, Emmanuel ;
Couderc, Louis-Jean ;
Devillier, Philippe ;
Thevenot, Etienne A. ;
Annane, Djillali .
EBIOMEDICINE, 2021, 63
[10]   Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review [J].
Harapan, Harapan ;
Itoh, Naoya ;
Yufika, Amanda ;
Winardi, Wira ;
Keam, Synat ;
Te, Haypheng ;
Megawati, Dewi ;
Hayati, Zinatul ;
Wagner, Abram L. ;
Mudatsir, Mudatsir .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 13 (05) :667-673