Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling

被引:16
作者
Abel, MH [1 ]
Watters, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Carolina Univ, Dept Psychol, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
关键词
guilt; leniency bias; physical attractiveness; punishment; smile-leniency effect;
D O I
10.3200/SOCP.145.6.687-703
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors found an interaction between sex of participant and sex of defendant in the leniency bias toward a smiling defendant. Differences occurred for male participants when levying punishment for a smiling male defendant vs. a smiling female defendant and for a smiling male defendant vs. a nonsmiling male defendant, whereas differences did not occur for female participants. The authors found moderating effects of physical attractiveness and smiling between guilt and punishment. The only significant positive relationship between guilt and punishment occurred for the defendant whom participants rated low in physical attractiveness and who was not smiling. When guilty, the smiling and unattractive defendant received less punishment than did the smiling and attractive defendant. The authors discussed complex relationships between physical attractiveness, smiling, guilt, and punishment.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 702
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on US participants' judgment and sentencing recommendations [J].
Abwender, DA ;
Hough, K .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 141 (05) :603-615
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Ecological and economical balance for sludge management options. Session 3: Technology and innovative options related to sludge management
[4]   REDUCING THE BIASING EFFECT OF PERPETRATOR ATTRACTIVENESS IN JURY SIMULATION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
DARLEY, JM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1982, 8 (02) :286-292
[5]   GENDER-BASED EXPECTANCIES AND OBSERVER JUDGMENTS OF SMILING [J].
BRITON, NJ ;
HALL, JA .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 19 (01) :49-65
[6]  
Brody L.R., 2000, GENDER EMOTION SOCIA, P24, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511628191.003
[7]  
CUNNINGHAM MR, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V50, P925, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF DEFENDANT AND JUROR ATTRACTIVENESS ON SIMULATED COURTROOM TRIAL DECISIONS [J].
DARBY, BW ;
JEFFERS, D .
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1988, 16 (01) :39-50
[9]   Defendants' characteristics of attractiveness, race, and sex and sentencing decisions [J].
DeSantis, A ;
Kayson, WA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1997, 81 (02) :679-683
[10]   WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD [J].
DION, K ;
WALSTER, E ;
BERSCHEID, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (03) :285-+