Use of levonorgestrel as emergency contraception in overweight women

被引:3
作者
Stowers, Paris [1 ,2 ]
Mestad, Renee [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, 1319 Punahou St,Suite 824, Honolulu, HI 96826 USA
关键词
Overweight; Contraception; Body mass index; Family planning; ULIPRISTAL ACETATE; YUZPE REGIMEN; BODY-WEIGHT; OBESITY; PHARMACOKINETICS; PREGNANCY; EFFICACY; BMI;
D O I
10.1016/j.orcp.2019.01.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Levonorgestrel (LNG) emergency contraception (EC) may have decreased efficacy for women with body mass indices (BMI) >= 26 kg/m(2). This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of LNG EC use and EC counseling among overweight women. Methods: The 2013-2015 dataset from the National Survey of Family Growth was analyzed to determine the proportion of women with BMI >= 26 kg/m(2) who report recent use of LNG EC and EC counseling. Results: Overall, 2.4% of respondents reported recent use of LNG EC. Among women using oral LNG for EC, 29.8% of survey participants reported BMI >= 26 kg/m(2). Additionally, 40.2% of women with BMI >= 26 kg/m(2) using oral LNG EC reported having a doctor or medical provider talk to them about emergency contraception within the last 12 months, compared to 18.3% of LNG EC users with BMI < 26 kg/m(2) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite recent counseling from clinicians and concerns for decreased efficacy, a significant number of overweight women continue to use LNG for EC. Clinicians should counsel women with BMI >= 26 kg/m(2) on the potential limitations of oral LNG for EC and offer more effective EC methods, including the copper intrauterine device and oral ulipristal acetate. (C) 2019 Asia Oceania Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 183
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Obstet Gynecol, V126, pe1, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001047
[2]   Emergency contraception: A multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices [J].
Batur, Pelin ;
Cleland, Kelly ;
McNamara, Megan ;
Wu, Justine ;
Pickle, Sarah .
CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (02) :145-152
[3]   Current controversies with oral emergency contraception [J].
Cameron, S. T. ;
Li, H. W. R. ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, K. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (13) :1948-1956
[4]   Obesity in Pregnancy [J].
Catalano, Patrick M. ;
Koutrouvelis, Gayle Olson .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06) :e112-e126
[5]   The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience [J].
Cleland, Kelly ;
Zhu, Haoping ;
Goldstuck, Norman ;
Cheng, Linan ;
Trussell, James .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27 (07) :1994-2000
[6]  
Curtis K.M., 2016, US MED ELIGIBILITY C
[7]   A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study to compare two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception in Nigeria [J].
Dada, Olukayode A. ;
Godfrey, Emily M. ;
Piaggio, Gilda ;
von Hertzen, Helena .
CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (04) :373-378
[8]   Impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel-based emergency contraception: single and double dosing [J].
Edelman, Alison B. ;
Cherala, Ganesh ;
Blue, Steven W. ;
Erikson, David W. ;
Jensen, Jeffrey T. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (01) :52-57
[9]  
Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 2017, CLIN GUID EM CONTR
[10]   Effect of BMI and body weight on pregnancy rates with LNG as emergency contraception: analysis of four WHO HRP studies [J].
Festin, Mario Philip R. ;
Peregoudov, Alexandre ;
Seuc, Armando ;
Kiarie, James ;
Temmerman, Marleen .
CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 95 (01) :50-54