Dominance among alternatives in random utility models

被引:16
作者
Cascetta, Ennio [1 ]
Papola, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dipartimento Ingn Trasporti L Tocchetti, I-80125 Naples, Italy
关键词
Choice set modelling; Dominance; Destination choice; CONSIDERATION SET; CHOICE MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2008.10.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
in many discrete choice contexts the actual choice set, including the alternatives effectively perceived and considered by the decision maker, may substantially differ from the universal choice set, including all available alternatives: one of the most relevant examples within transport demand simulation is probably the choice of destination, wherein the universal choice set normally includes hundreds of traffic zones. In these cases, proper simulation of the choice set is crucial for correct simulation of the choice context. In this regard, our paper has two main objectives. The first is to give a general contribution to choice set modelling by extending and applying the concept of dominance among alternatives to the framework of random utility theory. The main result is the definition of a methodology for the generation of new dominance attributes, which can be used in choice set modelling. The second aim is to make a specific contribution to destination choice modelling: dominance attributes are defined from the above methodology and introduced into this choice context, and new spatial variables reproducing better knowledge of zones with a privileged spatial position are also proposed. Methodology and attributes are tested both on synthetic and on real data. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 179
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Allenby G., 1995, INT J RES MARK, V12, P67
[2]   STUDYING CONSIDERATION EFFECTS IN EMPIRICAL CHOICE MODELS USING SCANNER PANEL-DATA [J].
ANDREWS, RL ;
SRINIVASAN, TC .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (01) :30-41
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, International Journal of Research in Marketing, DOI DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00004-L
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, P 13 INT S TRANSP TR
[5]   A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: an application to the San Francisco Bay Area [J].
Basar, G ;
Bhat, C .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2004, 38 (10) :889-904
[6]  
Ben-akiva M., 1995, INT J RES MARK, VVol. 12, P9, DOI DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00002-J
[7]  
Ben-Akiva M.E., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand, V9
[8]  
Ben-Akiva M. E., 1999, HDB TRANSPORTATION S, V26, P5
[9]  
Block Henry D., 1960, Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling
[10]   A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception [J].
Cantillo, V ;
Ortúzar, JD .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2005, 39 (07) :641-657