Partnering With a Purpose: Psychologists as Advocates in Organizations

被引:6
作者
Hill, James K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Waypoint Ctr Mental Hlth Care, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
关键词
organizational advocacy; professional psychology; collaboration; communication; COMMUNICATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1037/a0033120
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
To ensure that psychological issues are on policymakers' agenda, psychologists often focus professional advocacy efforts in the political and social realm. Psychologists working in organizations, however, also have a role in ensuring that professional issues rise into the consciousness of organizational decision makers. In an era of health care reform, the advent of program-based management, limited resources, and managed care, psychologists are under increasing pressure to show their worth inside organizations and often have limited ability to communicate with organizational leaders. Psychologists typically report to nonpsychologists who may have only a general understanding of what psychology offers and can often misunderstand requests from psychologists about patient care alternatives, time for research, ability to present at conferences, and so forth. Advocacy is one avenue for increasing effective communication of psychologists' perspectives and interests that can serve to educate leaders about the value of psychology and how to best use psychological expertise. A major benefit of organizational advocacy is learning advocacy skills in a known environment, which can then be transferred to broader social advocacy. The article discusses the development of advocacy skills in organizations and suggests possible advocacy activities that are consistent with the professional role. It is argued that clarity of the message and partnering with decision makers are important as psychologists advocate for the role of psychology in service delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Mentoring Professional Psychologists: Programs for Career Development, Advocacy, and Diversity
    Burney, J. Paul
    Celeste, Bobbie L.
    Johnson, Josephine Davis
    Klein, Nanci C.
    Nordal, Katherine C.
    Portnoy, Sanford M.
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2009, 40 (03) : 292 - 298
  • [2] The Psychology of Advocacy and the Advocacy of Psychology
    Cohen, Karen R.
    Lee, Catherine M.
    McIlwraith, Robert
    [J]. CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2012, 53 (03): : 151 - 158
  • [3] Navigating politics, policy, and procedure: A firsthand perspective of advocacy on behalf of the profession
    DeLeon, PH
    Loftis, CW
    Ball, V
    Sullivan, MJ
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2006, 37 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [4] RECONSIDERING OPENNESS IN ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION
    EISENBERG, EM
    WITTEN, MG
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1987, 12 (03) : 418 - 426
  • [5] Advocacy: The Key to the Survival and Growth of Professional Psychology
    Fox, Ronald E.
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2008, 39 (06) : 633 - 637
  • [6] Galer-Unti Regina A, 2004, Health Promot Pract, V5, P280, DOI 10.1177/1524839903257697
  • [7] Identifying Perceived Personal Barriers to Public Policy Advocacy Within Psychology
    Heinowitz, Amy E.
    Brown, Kelly R.
    Langsam, Leah C.
    Arcidiacono, Steven J.
    Baker, Paige L.
    Badaan, Nadimeh H.
    Zlatkin, Nancy I.
    Cash, Ralph E.
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 43 (04) : 372 - 378
  • [8] Jurkiewicz C.L., 2002, REV PUBLIC PERS ADM, V22, P52, DOI DOI 10.1177/0734371X0202200103
  • [9] Kassing J.W., 2001, MANAGE COMMUN Q, V14, P442, DOI DOI 10.1177/0893318901143003
  • [10] Latini JM, 2010, CURR CLIN UROL, P201, DOI 10.1007/978-1-59745-417-9_20