The elephant in the room: the role of failed invasions in understanding invasion biology

被引:174
作者
Zenni, Rafael D. [1 ]
Nunez, Martin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ANT ANOPLOLEPIS-GRACILIPES; TRACHEMYS-SCRIPTA-ELEGANS; BIOTIC RESISTANCE; PLANT INVASIONS; PHRAGMITES-AUSTRALIS; PROPAGULE PRESSURE; WASMANNIA-AUROPUNCTATA; ESTABLISHMENT SUCCESS; INTRODUCTION-HISTORY; SOUTHERN-HEMISPHERE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00254.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Most species introductions are not expected to result in invasion, and species that are invasive in one area are frequently not invasive in others. However, cases of introduced organisms that failed to invade are reported in many instances as anecdotes or are simply ignored. In this analysis, we aimed to find common characteristics between non-invasive populations of known invasive species and evaluated how the study of failed invasions can contribute to research on biological invasions. We found intraspecific variation in invasion success and several recurring explanations for why non-native species fail to invade; these included low propagule pressure, abiotic resistance, biotic resistance, genetic constraints and mutualist release. Furthermore, we identified key research topics where ignoring failed invasions could produce misleading results; these include studies on historical factors associated with invasions, distribution models of invasive species, the effect of species traits on invasiveness, genetic effects, biotic resistance and habitat invasibility. In conclusion, we found failed invasions can provide fundamental information on the relative importance of factors determining invasions and might be a key component of several research topics. Therefore, our analysis suggests that more specific and detailed studies on invasion failures are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 815
页数:15
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]   Little evidence of invasion by alien conifers in Europe [J].
Amparo Carrillo-Gavilan, Maria ;
Vila, Montserrat .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2010, 16 (02) :203-213
[2]  
[Anonymous], P S EX PEST PLANTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOL INVASIONS
[4]  
Baker H. G., 1965, The genetics of colonizing species., P147
[5]  
Bellingham PJ, 2004, OIKOS, V106, P308, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13171.x
[6]   A proposed unified framework for biological invasions [J].
Blackburn, Tim M. ;
Pysek, Petr ;
Bacher, Sven ;
Carlton, James T. ;
Duncan, Richard P. ;
Jarosik, Vojtech ;
Wilson, John R. U. ;
Richardson, David M. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2011, 26 (07) :333-339
[7]   Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds [J].
Blackburn, TM ;
Duncan, RP .
NATURE, 2001, 414 (6860) :195-197
[8]   Post-dispersal losses to seed predators: An experimental comparison of native and exotic old field plants [J].
Blaney, C.S. ;
Kotanen, P.M. .
1600, National Research Council of Canada (79)
[9]   POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOYCE, MS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1992, 23 :481-506
[10]   Is Pinus radiata invading the native vegetation in central Chile?: Demographic responses in a fragmented forest [J].
Bustamante, RO ;
Simonetti, JA .
BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2005, 7 (02) :243-249