DEMO and fusion power plant conceptual studies in Europe

被引:159
作者
Maisonnier, D
Cook, I
Pierre, S
Lorenzo, B
Luigi, DP
Luciano, G
Prachai, N
Aldo, P
机构
[1] EFDA CSU Garching, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] FZK, Assoc Euratom, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] ENEA CR, Assoc Euratom ENEA, Frascati, Italy
[4] CEA Saclay, Assoc Euratom, Gif Sur Yvette, France
关键词
PPCS; fusion reactor study; fusion power plant; DEMO reactor study;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.055
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Within the European Power Plant Conceptual Study (PPCS) four fusion power plant "models" have been developed. Two of these models were developed considering limited extrapolations both in physics and in technology. For the two other models, advanced physics scenarios have been identified and combined with advanced blanket concepts that allow higher thermodynamic efficiencies of the power conversion systems. For all the PPCS models, systems analyses were used to integrate the plasma physics and technology constraints to produce self-consistent plant parameter sets. The broad features of the conclusions of previous studies on safety, environmental impact and economics have been confirmed for the new models and demonstrated with increased confidence. The PPCS also helps in the definition of the objectives and in the identification of the design drivers of DEMO, i.e. the device between the next step (ITER) and a first-of-a-kind reactor. These will constitute the basis of the European DEMO Conceptual Study that has recently started. (c) 2005 David Maisonnier. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1130
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Materials and design of the European DEMO blankets [J].
Boccaccini, LV ;
Giancarli, L ;
Janeschitz, G ;
Hermsmeyer, S ;
Poitevin, Y ;
Cardella, A ;
Diegele, E .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2004, 329 :148-155
[2]   Blanket handling concepts for future fusion power plants [J].
Bogusch, E ;
Gottfried, R ;
Malsonnier, D .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2003, 69 (1-4) :135-139
[3]   Prospects for economic fusion electricity [J].
Cook, I ;
Miller, RL ;
Ward, DJ .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2002, 63-64 :25-33
[4]   Results, conclusions; and implications of the SEAFP-2 programme [J].
Cook, I ;
Marbach, G ;
Di Pace, L ;
Girard, C ;
Rocco, P ;
Taylor, NP .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 51-52 :409-417
[5]  
*EUR, 2001, CCEFU10622 EUR
[6]  
*EUR COUNC MIN, M HELD 27 NOV 2001 I
[7]   Demo blanket technology R&D results in EU [J].
Gasparotto, M ;
Boccaccini, L ;
Giancarli, L ;
Malang, S ;
Poitevin, Y .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2002, 61-62 :263-271
[8]   The European power plant conceptual study [J].
Maisonnier, D ;
Cook, I ;
Pierre, S ;
Lorenzo, B ;
Edgar, B ;
Karin, B ;
Luigi, DP ;
Robin, F ;
Luciano, G ;
Stephan, H ;
Claudio, N ;
Prachai, N ;
Aldo, P ;
Neill, T ;
David, W .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2005, 75-79 :1173-1179
[9]   ARIES-RS maintenance approach for high availability [J].
Malang, S ;
Najmabadi, F ;
Waganer, LM ;
Tillack, MS .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1998, 41 :377-383
[10]  
NORAJITRA P, 2004, P 20 IAEA FUS EN C P