Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) to volatiles collected from its host Pisum sativum L.

被引:21
|
作者
Ceballos, Ricardo [1 ]
Fernandez, Natali [1 ]
Zuniga, Sharon [2 ]
Zapata, Nelson [2 ]
机构
[1] INIA Quilamapu, Inst Invest Agr, Chillan, Chile
[2] Univ Concepcion, Fac Agron, Chillan, Chile
来源
关键词
Bruchids; EAG; IPM; pest monitoring; plant volatiles; INSECT OLFACTION; ALPHA-PINENE; RESISTANCE; BEETLE; CURCULIONIDAE; EVALUATE; PLANTS;
D O I
10.4067/S0718-58392015000200009
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) is one of the most damaging pests of pea (Pisum sativum L.) We investigated the role of pea volatiles on the electrophysiological and behavioral response of B. pisorum using electroantennography (EAG) and olfactometry bioassays. Plant volatiles emitted at different phenological stages were collected in situ by headspace on Porapak Q traps and analyzed through gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Most abundant volatiles identified in all phenological stages were terpenes and green leaf volatiles. All tested volatile extracts elicited significant EAG responses in both male and female B. pisorum, with females exhibiting a greater response (1.35 mV) than males (1.02 mV) to pea-pod volatiles. Volatiles from each phenological stage stimulated an attractant behavioral response of both males and females B. pisorum in olfactometer bioassay. A larger attraction of B. pisorum females was observed to volatiles from pods over other phenological stages (P < 0.001). These results suggest the relative importance of volatiles cues from plant mediating host location by B. pisorum. This work showed that plant volatiles elicited electrophysiological and behavioral responses and that B. pisorum female can discern between phenological stages of P. sativum based on those chemical cues.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 209
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cloning and expression of cytosolic phosphoglycerate kinase from pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Brice, DC
    Bryant, JA
    Dambrauskas, G
    Drury, SC
    Littlechild, JA
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2004, 55 (398) : 955 - 956
  • [43] Developing new SSR markers from ESTs of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Gong, Ya-ming
    Xu, Sheng-chun
    Mao, Wei-hua
    Hu, Qi-zan
    Zhang, Gu-wen
    Ding, Ju
    Li, Ya-dan
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2010, 11 (09): : 702 - 707
  • [44] MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON RHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM ISOLATED FROM PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Shahzad, Farooq
    Taj, Muhammad Kamran
    Abbas, Ferhat
    Shafee, Muhammad
    Essote, Saeed Ahmed
    Taj, Imran
    Achakzai, Abdul Manan
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2019, 48 (04): : 1223 - 1229
  • [45] Field Assessment of Outcrossing from Transgenic Pea (Pisum Sativum L.) Plants
    Patricia L. Polowick
    Albert Vandenberg
    John D. Mahon
    Transgenic Research, 2002, 11 : 515 - 519
  • [46] Field assessment of outcrossing from transgenic pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants
    Polowick, PL
    Vandenberg, A
    Mahon, JD
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (05) : 515 - 519
  • [47] Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Tenebrio molitor L. to fourteen kinds of plant volatiles
    Wang, Yan-chen
    Li, Peng
    Chi, De-fu
    JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2016, 19 (02) : 261 - 267
  • [48] GENETIC STUDIES IN RELATION TO YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Punia, S. S.
    Ram, Baldev
    Koli, N. R.
    Ranwha, B. R.
    Maloo, S. R.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (02) : 98 - 104
  • [49] Analysis of genetic architect of yield and its component in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Salam, J. L.
    Kashyap, O. P.
    Pandey, R. L.
    Nag, S. K.
    Ranjan, S. K.
    PLANT ARCHIVES, 2007, 7 (01): : 229 - 231
  • [50] Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of Hylastinus obscurus to volatiles released from the roots of Trifolium pratense L.
    Palma, R.
    Mutis, A.
    Manosalva, L.
    Ceballos, R.
    Quiroz, A.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2012, 12 (01): : 183 - 193