Evaluation of Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Ethanol Blended with Pear Nectar

被引:3
作者
Pankiewicz, Urszula [1 ]
Jamroz, Jerzy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci, Fac Food Sci & Biotechnol, Dept Anal & Evaluat Food Qual, Skromna St 8, PL-20704 Lublin, Poland
关键词
alcohol; nectar; model alcohol; perceived density; perceived viscosity; SOLUTION VISCOSITY; PERCEPTION; TEXTURE; FOOD; WINE; GLYCEROL; DENSITY; SYSTEMS; FLAVOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.17221/400/2011-CJFS
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
PANKIEWICZ U., JAMROZ J. (2013): Evaluation of physicochemical and sensory properties of ethanol blended with pear nectar. Czech J. Food Sci., 31: 66-71. Ten trained panelists evaluated the perceived density as well as the physical and perceived viscosities of the product obtained by blending ethanol with pear nectar. There was a link between the concentrations of ethanol in pure vodka and in its blend with the nectar, and the perceived sensory viscosity and the drink density. There was a very good (R-2 = 0.9442) and poor (R-2 = 0.6464) correlation, respectively, between the experimentally found density and viscosity and the perceived viscosity of aqueous ethanol. These properties of aqueous ethanol and alcohol pear drinks correlated very well (R-2 = 0.9430 and 0.9774) with one another. 50% ethanol with the nectar had a density similar to that of aqueous ethanol solution taken as the standard. The admixture of the pear nectar increased the sensory sensitivity of the viscosity measurements of these solutions. The correlation between the perceived and physical viscosities could be used as a guide for the sensory and qualitative control of vodkas.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 71
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] BOURNE M C, 1975, Journal of Texture Studies, V6, P259, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1975.tb01253.x
  • [2] BURNS DJW, 1986, J TEXTURE STUD, V16, P365
  • [3] EFFECTS OF SOLUTION VISCOSITY ON PERCEIVED SALTINESS AND SWEETNESS
    CHRISTENSEN, CM
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (04): : 347 - 353
  • [4] EFFECTS OF TASTE QUALITY AND INTENSITY ON ORAL PERCEPTION OF VISCOSITY
    CHRISTENSEN, CM
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (04): : 315 - 320
  • [5] How thick is thick? Multicenter study of the rheological and material property characteristics of mealtime fluids and videofluoroscopy fluids
    Cichero, JAY
    Jackson, O
    Halley, PJ
    Murdoch, BE
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 2000, 15 (04) : 188 - 200
  • [6] Effects of carbohydrate and noncarbohydrate sweeteners on the orange spirit volatile compounds
    Da Porto, C
    Cordaro, F
    Marcassa, N
    [J]. LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 39 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [7] AN IMPROVED MODEL FOR FOOD THICKNESS FROM NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID-MECHANICS IN THE MOUTH
    DICKIE, AM
    KOKINI, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1983, 48 (01) : 57 - &
  • [8] What is mouthfeel? Sensory-rheological relationships in instant hot cocoa drinks
    Folkenberg, DM
    Bredie, WLP
    Martens, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 1999, 14 (02) : 181 - 195
  • [9] Examination of chemical irritation and textural influence on food preferences in two age cohorts using complex food systems
    Forde, CG
    Delahunty, CM
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2002, 13 (7-8) : 571 - 581
  • [10] The effect of viscosity on the perception of flavour
    Hollowood, TA
    Linforth, RST
    Taylor, AJ
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2002, 27 (07) : 583 - 591