Intervention Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of a Successful Telephonic Intervention to Promote Diabetes Control

被引:35
作者
Schechter, Clyde B. [2 ]
Cohen, Hillel W. [3 ]
Shmukler, Celia [4 ]
Walker, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol & Diabet, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Family & Social Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] 1199SEIU Benefit & Pens Funds, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARE-MANAGEMENT; PEER SUPPORT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.2337/dc12-0048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE-To characterize the costs and cost-effectiveness of a telephonic behavioral intervention to promote glycemic control in the Improving Diabetes Outcomes study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Using the provider perspective and a time horizon to the end of the 1-year intervention, we calculate the costs of a telephonic intervention by health educators compared with an active control (print) intervention to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. We calculate the cost-effectiveness ratios for a reduction of one percentage point in hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C), as well as for one participant to achieve an A1C<7%. Base-case and sensitivity analysis results are presented. RESULTS-The intervention cost $176.61 per person randomized to the telephone group to achieve a mean 0.36 percentage point of A1C improvement. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $490.58 per incremental percentage point of A1C improvement and $2,617.35 per person over a 1-year intervention in achieving the A1C goal. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the median (interquartile range) of per capita cost, cost per percentage point reduction in A1C, and cost per person achieving the A1C goal of<7% are $175.82 (147.32-203.56), $487.75 (356.50-718.32), and $2,312.88 (1,785.58-3,220.78), respectively. CONCLUSIONS-The costs of a telephonic intervention for diabetes self-management support aremoderate and commensurate to the modest associated improvement in glycemic control. Diabetes Care 35:2156-2160,2012
引用
收藏
页码:2156 / 2160
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Amer Diabet Assoc, 2011, DIABETES CARE, V34, pS11, DOI [10.2337/dc10-S062, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc11-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc12-s064, 10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc12-s011]
  • [2] The Role of Peer Support in Diabetes Care and Self-Management
    Brownson, Carol A.
    Heisler, Michele
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2009, 2 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [3] Measurements of medication adherence in diabetic patients with poorly controlled HbA1c
    Cohen, H. W.
    Shmukler, C.
    Ullman, R.
    Rivera, C. M.
    Walker, E. A.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (02) : 210 - 216
  • [4] Drummond MF., 2006, METHODS EC EVALUATIO
  • [5] Efron Bradley, 1994, An Introduction to the bootstrap, DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
  • [6] Freeman RB, OCCUPATIONAL WAGES W
  • [7] Evaluation of a Behavior Support Intervention for Patients With Poorly Controlled Diabetes
    Frosch, Dominick L.
    Uy, Visith
    Ochoa, Socorro
    Mangione, Carol M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (22) : 2011 - 2017
  • [8] Funnell MM, 2010, DIABETES CARE, V33, pS89, DOI [10.2337/dc10-S089, 10.2337/dc11-S089]
  • [9] Twelve-month outcomes of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    Kurz, Deanna
    King, Diane
    Dickman, Jennifer M.
    Faber, Andrew J.
    Halterman, Eve
    Woolley, Tim
    Toobert, Deborah J.
    Strycker, Lisa A.
    Estabrooks, Paul A.
    Osuna, Diego
    Ritzwoller, Debra
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 87 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [10] Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management A Randomized Trial
    Heisler, Michele
    Vijan, Sandeep
    Makki, Fatima
    Piette, John D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 153 (08) : 507 - 515