User-centered design principles in the development of clinical research tools

被引:29
作者
Walden, Anita [1 ]
Garvin, Lynsi [2 ]
Smerek, Michelle [2 ]
Johnson, Constance [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Biomed Informat, 4301 West Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Biomed Informat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
User-centered design methods; usability testing; clinical study tools; patient-centered design; digital health; PATIENT SAFETY; USABILITY; EVALUATE; QUALITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/1740774520946314
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Increasing and sustaining the engagement of participants in clinical research studies is a goal for clinical investigators, especially for studies that require long-term or frequent involvement of participants. Technology can be used to reduce barriers to participation by providing multiple options for clinical data entry and form submission. However, electronic systems used in clinical research studies should be user-friendly while also ensuring data quality. Directly involving study participants in evaluating the effectiveness and usability of electronic tools may promote wider adoption, maintain involvement, and increase user satisfaction of the technology. While developers of healthcare applications have incorporated user-centered designs, these methods remain uncommon in the design of clinical study tools such as patient-reported outcome surveys or electronic data capture digital health tools. Methods: Our study evaluated whether the clinical research setting may benefit from implementing user-centered design principles. Study participants were recruited to test the web-based form for the Measurement to Understand the Reclassification of Disease of Cabarrus/Kannapolis (MURDOCK) Study Community Translational Population Health Registry and Biorepository that would enable them to complete their study forms electronically. The study enrollment form collects disease history, conditions, smoking status, medications, and other information. The system was initially evaluated by the data management team through traditional user-acceptance testing methods. During the tool evaluation phase, a decision was made to incorporate a small-scale usability study to directly test the system. Results: Results showed that a majority of participants found the system easy to use. Of the eight required tasks, 75% were completed successfully. Of the 72 heuristics violated, language was the most frequent violation. Conclusion: Our study showed that user-centered usability methods can identify important issues and capture information that can enhance the participant's experience and may improve the quality of study tools.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 711
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale [J].
Bangor, Aaron ;
Kortum, Philip T. ;
Miller, James T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 24 (06) :574-594
[2]   A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests [J].
Bates, DW ;
Kuperman, GJ ;
Rittenberg, E ;
Teich, JM ;
Fiskio, J ;
Ma'luf, N ;
Onderdonk, A ;
Wybenga, D ;
Winkelman, J ;
Brennan, TA ;
Komaroff, AL ;
Tanasijevic, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 106 (02) :144-150
[3]  
Belden J.L., 2009, Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating
[4]   Usability Testing Finds Problems for Novice Users of Pediatric Portals [J].
Britto, Maria T. ;
Jimison, Holly B. ;
Munafo, Jennifer Knopf ;
Wissman, Jennifer ;
Rogers, Michelle L. ;
Hersh, William .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2009, 16 (05) :660-669
[5]  
Brook J, 1996, Usability Evaluation in Industry, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9781498710411, DOI 10.1201/9781498710411-35]
[6]   Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials [J].
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Eremenco, Sonya ;
Lundy, J. Jason ;
O'Donohoe, Paul ;
O'Gorman, Hannah ;
Malizia, William .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (04) :301-309
[7]   USER ACCEPTANCE OF COMPUTER-TECHNOLOGY - A COMPARISON OF 2 THEORETICAL-MODELS [J].
DAVIS, FD ;
BAGOZZI, RP ;
WARSHAW, PR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (08) :982-1003
[8]   VERBAL REPORTS AS DATA [J].
ERICSSON, KA ;
SIMON, HA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1980, 87 (03) :215-251
[9]  
Everatt GD, 2007, SOFTWARE DEV LIFE CY, P29
[10]   Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing [J].
Faulkner, L .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2003, 35 (03) :379-383