The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants

被引:114
作者
Moberly, Aaron C. [1 ]
Bates, Chelsea [1 ]
Harris, Michael S. [1 ]
Pisoni, David B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Adults; Cochlear implants; Sensorineural hearing loss; Speech perception; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION; WORKING-MEMORY; COGNITIVE-FACTORS; SPOKEN WORDS; CHILDREN; HEARING; NOISE; INTERFACE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000001211
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Considerable unexplained variability and large individual differences exist in speech recognition outcomes for postlingually deaf adults who use cochlear implants (CIs), and a sizeable fraction of CI users can be considered "poor performers.'' This article summarizes our current knowledge of poor CI performance, and provides suggestions to clinicians managing these patients. Method: Studies are reviewed pertaining to speech recognition variability in adults with hearing loss. Findings are augmented by recent studies in our laboratories examining outcomes in postlingually deaf adults with CIs. Results: In addition to conventional clinical predictors of CI performance (e.g., amount of residual hearing, duration of deafness), factors pertaining to both "bottom-up'' auditory sensitivity to the spectro-temporal details of speech, and "top-down'' linguistic knowledge and neurocognitive functions contribute to CI outcomes. Conclusions: The broad array of factors that contribute to speech recognition performance in adult CI users suggests the potential both for novel diagnostic assessment batteries to explain poor performance, and also new rehabilitation strategies for patients who exhibit poor outcomes. Moreover, this broad array of factors determining outcome performance suggests the need to treat individual CI patients using a personalized rehabilitation approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1522 / 1528
页数:7
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults [J].
Akeroyd, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 :S53-S71
[2]   Clustering coefficients of lexical neighborhoods [J].
Altieri, Nicholas ;
Gruenenfelder, Thomas ;
Pisoni, David B. .
MENTAL LEXICON, 2010, 5 (01) :1-21
[3]   Auditory Brainstem Response to Complex Sounds Predicts Self-Reported Speech-in-Noise Performance [J].
Anderson, Samira ;
Parbery-Clark, Alexandra ;
White-Schwoch, Travis ;
Kraus, Nina .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 56 (01) :31-43
[4]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS SYSTEMS NE
[5]   Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion [J].
Arehart, Kathryn H. ;
Souza, Pamela ;
Baca, Rosalinda ;
Kates, James M. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (03) :251-260
[6]   A Prospective Longitudinal Study of US Children Unable to Achieve Open-Set Speech Recognition 5 Years After Cochlear Implantation [J].
Barnard, Jennifer M. ;
Fisher, Laurel M. ;
Johnson, Karen C. ;
Eisenberg, Laurie S. ;
Wang, Nae-Yuh ;
Quittner, Alexandra L. ;
Carson, Christine M. ;
Niparko, John K. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (06) :985-992
[7]   What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? [J].
Behrmann, M ;
Kimchi, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2003, 29 (01) :19-42
[8]  
Benard MR, 2013, J ACOUST SOC AM, V135, P88
[9]   Word Recognition Within a Linguistic Context: Effects of Age, Hearing Acuity, Verbal Ability, and Cognitive Function [J].
Benichov, Jonathan ;
Cox, L. Clarke ;
Tun, Patricia A. ;
Wingfield, Arthur .
EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (02) :262-268
[10]   Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users [J].
Bhargava, Pranesh ;
Gaudrain, Etienne ;
Baskent, Deniz .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2014, 309 :113-123