Functional outcome after endoprosthetic limb-salvage therapy of primary bone tumours - a comparative analysis using the MSTS score, the TESS and the RNL index

被引:64
作者
Tunn, P. U. [1 ]
Pomraenke, D. [1 ]
Goerling, U. [1 ]
Hohenberger, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Surg & Surg Oncol, Robert Rossle Klin, Helios Klinikum Berlin, D-13122 Berlin, Germany
关键词
bone tumour; prosthetic replacement; limb function; quality of life; outcome research;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-007-0388-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Limb-saving therapy for primary bone tumours is the treatment of choice. We aimed at analysing the quality of life of this group of patients by combining three different tools. Eighty-seven patients (46 females, 41 males) with a primary bone tumour of the extremity who had undergone endoprosthetic reconstruction between 1982 and 2000 were included in this retrospective study. The median age at the time of evaluation was 30 (12-73) years. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and the Reintegration to Normal Living index (RNL) were recorded an average of 5.8 years after reconstruction and the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) after an average of 6.5 years. The mean MSTS score was 77% (13-93%). The mean TESS was 82% (22-99%), and the mean RNL index was 87% (32-98%). The subjective satisfaction and acceptance of physical impairment were significantly higher than the objective score (p < 0.001). The TESS was 88% in patients aged 12-25 years, 81% in those aged 26-40 years and 57% in those aged 41-73 years. Parallel recording of the MSTS score, TESS and RNL index provides a better measure reflecting the complex situation of the patients by combining objective and subjective parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 625
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[2]  
Cox D.R., 1981, APPL STAT PRINCIPLES
[3]  
Davis AM, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P90
[4]   Functional outcome in amputation versus limb sparing of patients with lower extremity sarcoma: A matched case-control study [J].
Davis, AM ;
Devlin, M ;
Griffin, AM ;
Wunder, JS ;
Bell, RS .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (06) :615-618
[5]   Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma [J].
Davis, AM ;
Wright, JG ;
Williams, JI ;
Bombardier, C ;
Griffin, A ;
Bell, RS .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (05) :508-516
[6]  
ENNEKING WF, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P241
[7]  
Fabroni RH, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P41
[8]   CLINIMETRIC PERSPECTIVES [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (06) :635-640
[9]   Prosthetic reconstruction of the femur for primary bone sarcoma [J].
Gerrand, CH ;
Currie, D ;
Grigoris, P ;
Reid, R ;
Hamblen, DL .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1999, 23 (05) :286-290
[10]   Malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia: Endoprosthetic replacement or rotationplasty - Functional outcome and quality-of-life measurements [J].
Hillman, A ;
Hoffmann, C ;
Gosheger, G ;
Krakau, H ;
Winkelmann, W .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) :462-468