The importance of iliac fixation in prevention of stent graft migration

被引:66
作者
Heikkinen, Maarit A.
Alsac, Jean Marc
Arko, Frank R.
Metsanoja, Riina
Zvaigzne, Agnis
Zarins, Christopher K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Med, Div Vasc Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Tampere Univ, Dept Surg, Tampere, Finland
[3] Henri Mondor Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Creteil, France
[4] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Paul Stradins Univ Hosp, Riga, Latvia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.031
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Secure proximal fixation of endografts to the infrarenal aortic neck is known to be important in the short- and long-term success of endovascular aneurysm repair. We sought to determine the relative importance of distal iliac fixation in preventing endograft migration and adverse clinical events after endovascular aneurysm repair. Methods. We reviewed the outcome of 173 patients treated from 1996 to 2003 at Stanford University Medical Center with an externally supported stent graft. Quantitative image analysis of the postimplantation computed tomography scan was performed to determine the proximal aortic and distal iliac fixation lengths and the proximity the distal end of the stent graft to the iliac bifurcation. Subsequent follow-up computed tomography scans were reviewed for evidence of stent graft migration. Patients were grouped according to good (> 15 mm), intermediate, or bad (< 10 mm) aortic fixation and good (iliac fixation length >= 25 rum and iliac limbs < 10 mm from iliac bifurcation), intermediate, or bad (< 25-mm fixation length) iliac fixation. Results. Stent graft migration of 10 mm or more was seen in 17 patients (10%) during the 23 +/- 19-month follow-up period. Patients with no migration had a greater iliac fixation length (30 +/- 12 nun) than those with migration (22 8 mm; P = .01), and the distal ends of the iliac limbs were closer to the iliac bifurcation (15 +/- 12 mm) than in patients with migration (25 +/- 10 mm; P < .001). Patients with no migration also had a greater proximal aortic fixation length (23 +/- 12 mm) than migration patients (13 7 mm; P = .001). There were no migrations among patients with good iliac fixation whether aortic fixation was good, intermediate, or bad (0/63; 0%). Among patients with bad/intermediate iliac and good aortic fixation, there were 5 (9%) of 58 patients had migrations. Patients with both bad/intermediate iliac and bad/intermediate aortic fixation had the highest migration rate (12/52; 23%). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling revealed that the significant factors predicting migration were poor proximity of the distal. end of the iliac limbs to the iliac bifurcation (odds ratio 17.2; P = .01) and aortic fixation length (odds ratio 2.0; p = 0.007 for each centimeter). Iliac extender modules were placed in 9 patients with bad iliac fixation and migration, with no further migration during a mean follow-up of 12 months. Patients with good iliac and aortic fixation and no endoleak on the initial postprocedure computed tomography scan (n = 43) had no migrations, secondary procedures, or adverse clinical events over a 2-year follow-up period. Conclusions. Iliac fixation, along with proximal aortic fixation, is an important factor in preventing the migration of stent grafts that have longitudinal columnar support. Patients with good iliac fixation did not experience migration even in the presence of suboptimal proximal aortic fixation. Close proximity of the distal end of the stent graft to the iliac bifurcation seems to provide stability against migration.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1137
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Iliac fixation length and resistance to in-vivo stent-graft displacement
    Arko, FR
    Heikkinen, M
    Lee, ES
    Bass, A
    Alsac, JM
    Zarins, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 41 (04) : 664 - 670
  • [2] Arko FR, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P503, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0503:TIEFEA>2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Aortic neck attachment failure and the AneuRx graft: Incidence, treatment options, and early results
    Azizzadeh, A
    Sanchez, LA
    Rubin, BG
    Parodi, JC
    Godshall, CJ
    Geraghty, PJ
    Choi, ET
    Flye, MW
    Curci, JA
    Sicard, GA
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 19 (04) : 516 - 521
  • [5] Diagnosis and treatment of inferior mesenteric arterial endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Baum, RA
    Carpenter, JP
    Tuite, CM
    Velazquez, OC
    Soulen, MC
    Barker, CF
    Golden, MA
    Pyeron, AM
    Fairman, RM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 409 - 413
  • [6] Biebl M, 2005, MT SINAI J MED, V72, P127
  • [7] Mid-term fixation stability of the EndoVascular Technologies endograft
    Broeders, IAMJ
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Wever, JJ
    Eikelboom, BC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 18 (04) : 300 - 307
  • [8] Device migration after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Analysis of 113 cases with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years
    Cao, P
    Verzini, F
    Zannetti, S
    De Rango, P
    Parlani, G
    Lupattelli, L
    Maselli, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (02) : 229 - 235
  • [9] Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Chaikof, EL
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Harris, PL
    White, GH
    Zarins, CK
    Bernhard, VM
    Matsumura, JS
    May, J
    Veith, FJ
    Fillinger, MF
    Rutherford, RB
    Kent, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) : 1048 - 1060
  • [10] Stent-graft design: the good, the bad and the ugly
    Chuter, TAM
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 10 (01): : 7 - 13