A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Plastic Surgery: Looking to the Future

被引:31
作者
Spoer, Daisy L. [1 ,2 ]
Kiene, Julianne M. [1 ]
Dekker, Paige K. [3 ]
Huffman, Samuel S. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Kevin G. [4 ]
Abadeer, Andrew I. [2 ]
Fan, Kenneth L. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif Sch Med, Div Plast Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] MedStar Hlth Res Inst, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
关键词
CLEFT-LIP; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; BURN PATIENTS; PREDICTION; CHILDREN; VIDEO; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004608
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is presently employed in several medical specialties, particularly those that rely on large quantities of standardized data. The integration of AI in surgical subspecialties is under preclinical investigation but is yet to be widely implemented. Plastic surgeons collect standardized data in various settings and could benefit from AI. This systematic review investigates the current clinical applications of AI in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases was conducted for AI studies with multiple search terms. Articles that progressed beyond the title and abstract screening were then subcategorized based on the plastic surgery subspecialty and AI application. Results: The systematic search yielded a total of 1820 articles. Forty-four studies met inclusion criteria warranting further analysis. Subcategorization of articles by plastic surgery subspecialties revealed that most studies fell into aesthetic and breast surgery (27%), craniofacial surgery (23%), or microsurgery (14%). Analysis of the research study phase of included articles indicated that the current research is primarily in phase 0 (discovery and invention; 43.2%), phase 1 (technical performance and safety; 27.3%), or phase 2 (efficacy, quality improvement, and algorithm performance in a medical setting; 27.3%). Only one study demonstrated translation to clinical practice. Conclusions: The potential of AI to optimize clinical efficiency is being investigated in every subfield of plastic surgery, but much of the research to date remains in the preclinical status. Future implementation of AI into everyday clinical practice will require collaborative efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[81]   Prediction of burn healing time using artificial neural networks and reflectance spectrometer [J].
Yeong, EK ;
Hsiao, TC ;
Chiang, HK ;
Lin, CW .
BURNS, 2005, 31 (04) :415-420
[82]   Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review [J].
Yi, Xin ;
Walia, Ekta ;
Babyn, Paul .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2019, 58
[83]   Artificial intelligence in healthcare [J].
Yu, Kun-Hsing ;
Beam, Andrew L. ;
Kohane, Isaac S. .
NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 2 (10) :719-731
[84]   Predicting postoperative facial swelling following impacted mandibular third molars extraction by using artificial neural networks evaluation [J].
Zhang, Wei ;
Li, Jun ;
Li, Zu-Bing ;
Li, Zhi .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8