What can feminist theory offer policy implementation challenges?

被引:20
作者
Carey, Gemma [1 ]
Dickinson, Helen [1 ]
Olney, Sue [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2019年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
policy implementation; cross-boundary working; feminism; GENDER; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; MANAGERS; HEALTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1332/174426417X14881935664929
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Implementation has long been a vexed issue in the mainstream public policy literature.The literature has remained more concerned with the design of policy and evidence of its impact than on the process by which it plays out. While implementation is often portrayed as a simple process of adopting best practice, experiences indicate that it is a far more complex process involving a range of actors translating policy into practice under varying conditions. Substantial changes to public service environments over the past few decades, both incremental and disruptive, have compounded this complexity. Commentators argue that it is time to took beyond current 'best practice for new conceptual toots to tackle implementation challenges, particularly relating to those that take place around the many boundaries of public services (Dickinson and Sullivan, 2014a). In this paper we consider how post-structural feminist perspectives, with scope to actively challenge orthodoxies and embrace diversity and competing views, might further contemporary policy implementation research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Adichie ChimamandaNgozi., 2015, We Should All Be Feminists
[2]  
Althaus C, 2016, IMPLEMENTATION STATE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, THEORIES POLICY PROC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REFORMRISK WHAT HA
[5]  
[Anonymous], HOLISTIC GOVT
[6]  
[Anonymous], REFLECTIONS 21 CENTU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MAKING REFORM HAPPEN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1984, IMPLEMENTATION
[9]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 14 STAT SERV AUTH AU