Evaluation of unconfined aquifer parameters from flow to partially penetrating wells in Tailan River basin, China

被引:6
作者
Appiah-Adjei, Emmanuel Kwame [1 ,2 ]
Shu, Longcang [1 ,3 ]
Adjei, Kwaku Amaning [1 ]
Deng, Minjing [4 ]
Wang, Xiaohui [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Geol Engn, Kumasi, Ghana
[3] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Dept Water Resources Xinjiang, Xinjiang 830063, Peoples R China
关键词
Tailan River basin; Pumping test; Unconfined aquifer; Partial penetration; MODFLOW; Moench solution; WATER-TABLE;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-012-1965-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective evaluation, management and abstraction of groundwater resources of any aquifer require accurate and reliable estimates of its hydraulic parameters. This study, therefore, looks at the determination of hydraulic parameters of an unconfined aquifer using both analytical and numerical approaches. A long-duration pumping test data obtained from an unconfined aquifer system within the Tailan River basin in Xinjiang Autonomous Region in the northwest of China is used, in this study, to investigate the best method for estimating the parameters of the aquifer. The pumping test was conducted by pumping from a radial collector well and measuring the response in nine observation wells; all the wells used in the test were partially penetrating. Using two well-known tools, namely AquiferTest and MODFLOW, as an aid for the analytical and numerical approaches, respectively, the parameters of the aquifer were determined and their outputs compared. The estimated horizontal hydraulic conductivity, vertical hydraulic conductivity, and specific yield for the analytical approach are 38.1-50.30 m/day, 3.02-9.05 m/day and 0.204-0.339, respectively, while the corresponding numerical estimates are 20.50-35.24 m/day, 0.10-3.40 m/day, and 0.27-0.31, respectively. Comparing the two, the numerical estimates were found to be more representative of the aquifer in the study area since it simulated the groundwater flow conditions of the pumping test in the aquifer system better than the analytical solution.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 809
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DOCUMENTATION USERS
[2]  
Boulton N.S., 1963, Proc Inst of Civil Engineers, V26, P469, DOI [10.1680/iicep.1963.10409, DOI 10.1680/IICEP.1963.10409]
[3]  
Fetter C.W., 2001, Applied Hydrogeology: University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh, VFourth
[4]  
Kruseman G.P., 1994, ANAL EVALUATION PUMP, V2nd
[5]  
Kumar CP, 2008, AQUIFER PARAMETER ES
[6]  
Lebbe L, 1992, APPL HYDROGEOL, V4, P20
[7]  
MacDonald M. G., 1988, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, V6
[8]   SPECIFIC YIELD AS DETERMINED BY TYPE-CURVE ANALYSIS OF AQUIFER-TEST DATA [J].
MOENCH, AF .
GROUND WATER, 1994, 32 (06) :949-957
[9]   COMPUTATION OF TYPE CURVES FOR FLOW TO PARTIALLY PENETRATING WELLS IN WATER-TABLE AQUIFERS [J].
MOENCH, AF .
GROUND WATER, 1993, 31 (06) :966-971
[10]   Analytical and numerical analyses of an unconfined aquifer test considering unsaturated zone characteristics [J].
Moench, Allen F. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (06)