Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases

被引:48
作者
Scott, F. [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, K. [1 ]
Carey, L. [3 ]
Greville, W. [3 ]
Mansfield, N. [3 ]
Barahona, P. [3 ]
Robertson, R. [1 ]
McLennan, A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sydney Ultrasound Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Genea, Mol Genet, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
array CGH; nuchal translucency; prenatal diagnosis; QF-PCR; ultrasound; CHROMOSOMAL MICROARRAY; IMPLEMENTATION; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.12429
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives First, to assess the performance of a prenatal diagnostic service using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as first-line investigations. Second, to determine the incidence of copy number variants (CNVs) by indication for testing, with particular reference to ultrasound and biochemical parameters measured in combined first-trimester screening. Methods All patients undergoing invasive prenatal testing at a specialist prenatal screening service in Sydney, Australia, were included in the study. All samples underwent QF-PCR and targeted aCGH. Results Of 1049 cases, CNVs were reported in 156 (14.9%). Preliminary QF-PCR identified abnormalities in 104 of these cases. Of the remaining 52 cases, 20 could have been detected on karyotype testing, leaving 32 cases (3.1%) with CNVs only detectable by aCGH, of which 13 (1.2%) were pathogenic. Variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were seen in only three cases. Fetal structural abnormalities identified in the first trimester were the group most likely to be associated with pathogenic CNVs (11.8%). Conclusions Combining QF-PCR and aCGH is an effective first-tier prenatal testing regime that does not require conventional karyotyping. The incidence of VOUS in this study was very low owing to appropriate aCGH targeting and specific reporting criteria that reduced the number of potentially difficult counseling encounters. Pathogenic CNVs are positively correlated with the presence of fetal structural abnormalities, but not with enlarged nuchal translucency or abnormal first-trimester serology results. Copyright. (C) 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance
    Ahn, Joo Wook
    Mann, Kathy
    Walsh, Sally
    Shehab, Marwa
    Hoang, Sarah
    Docherty, Zoe
    Mohammed, Shehla
    Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie
    [J]. MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS, 2010, 3
  • [2] Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era?
    Bui, The-Hung
    Vetro, Annalisa
    Zuffardi, Orsetta
    Shaffer, Lisa G.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [3] Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray
    Coppinger, Justine
    Alliman, Sarah
    Lamb, Allen N.
    Torchia, Beth S.
    Bejjani, Bassem A.
    Shaffer, Lisa G.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (12) : 1156 - 1166
  • [4] aCGH on chorionic villi mirrors the complexity of fetoplacental mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis
    Filges, Isabel
    Kang, Anjeung
    Klug, Vanessa
    Wenzel, Friedel
    Heinimann, Karl
    Tercanli, Sevgi
    Miny, Peter
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (05) : 473 - 478
  • [5] Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases
    Fiorentino, Francesco
    Caiazzo, Fiorina
    Napolitano, Stefania
    Spizzichino, Letizia
    Bono, Sara
    Sessa, Mariateresa
    Nuccitelli, Andrea
    Biricik, Anil
    Gordon, Anthony
    Rizzo, Giuseppe
    Baldi, Marina
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (13) : 1270 - 1282
  • [6] High-resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis
    Friedman, J. M.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [7] Applications of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Obstetrics
    Fruhman, Gary
    Van den Veyver, Ignatia B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 37 (01) : 71 - +
  • [8] Cystinosis
    Gahl, WA
    Thoene, JG
    Schneider, JA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (02) : 111 - 121
  • [9] Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review
    Hillman, S. C.
    McMullan, D. J.
    Williams, D.
    Maher, E. R.
    Kilby, M. D.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 40 (04) : 385 - 391
  • [10] Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hillman, S. C.
    Pretlove, S.
    Coomarasamy, A.
    McMullan, D. J.
    Davison, E. V.
    Maher, E. R.
    Kilby, M. D.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 37 (01) : 6 - 14