Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention

被引:253
作者
Wild, Conor J. [1 ]
Yusuf, Afiqah [2 ]
Wilson, Daryl E. [2 ]
Peelle, Jonathan E. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Davis, Matthew H. [5 ]
Johnsrude, Ingrid S. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Ctr Neurosci Studies, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Univ Penn, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
[6] Linkoping Univ, Linnaeus Ctr Hearing & Deafness HEAD, Dept Behav Sci & Learning, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; HUMAN AUDITORY-CORTEX; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; RHESUS-MONKEY; BASAL GANGLIA; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; CORTICAL CONNECTIONS; UNATTENDED SPEECH; NEURAL MECHANISMS; VISUAL EVENTS;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The conditions of everyday life are such that people often hear speech that has been degraded (e.g., by background noise or electronic transmission) or when they are distracted by other tasks. However, it remains unclear what role attention plays in processing speech that is difficult to understand. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the degree to which spoken sentences were processed under distraction, and whether this depended on the acoustic quality (intelligibility) of the speech. On every trial, adult human participants attended to one of three simultaneously presented stimuli: a sentence (at one of four acoustic clarity levels), an auditory distracter, or a visual distracter. A postscan recognition test showed that clear speech was processed even when not attended, but that attention greatly enhanced the processing of degraded speech. Furthermore, speech-sensitive cortex could be parcellated according to how speech-evoked responses were modulated by attention. Responses in auditory cortex and areas along the superior temporal sulcus (STS) took the same form regardless of attention, although responses to distorted speech in portions of both posterior and anterior STS were enhanced under directed attention. In contrast, frontal regions, including left inferior frontal gyrus, were only engaged when listeners were attending to speech and these regions exhibited elevated responses to degraded, compared with clear, speech. We suggest this response is a neural marker of effortful listening. Together, our results suggest that attention enhances the processing of degraded speech by engaging higher-order mechanisms that modulate perceptual auditory processing.
引用
收藏
页码:14010 / 14021
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Cognitive operations in the human caudate nucleus
    Abdullaev, YG
    Melnichuk, KV
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1997, 234 (2-3) : 151 - 155
  • [2] PARALLEL ORGANIZATION OF FUNCTIONALLY SEGREGATED CIRCUITS LINKING BASAL GANGLIA AND CORTEX
    ALEXANDER, GE
    DELONG, MR
    STRICK, PL
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1986, 9 : 357 - 381
  • [3] Hemispheric lateralization of cerebral blood-flow changes during selective listening to dichotically presented continuous speech
    Alho, K
    Vorobyev, VA
    Medvedev, SV
    Pakhomov, SV
    Roudas, MS
    Tervaniemi, M
    van Zuijen, T
    Näätänen, R
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 17 (02): : 201 - 211
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [5] [Anonymous], ACTA OTOLARYNGOL S
  • [6] A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm
    Ashburner, John
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 38 (01) : 95 - 113
  • [7] The insula (Island of Reil) and its role in auditory processing literature review
    Bamiou, DE
    Musiek, FE
    Luxon, LM
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2003, 42 (02) : 143 - 154
  • [8] The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing
    Booth, James R.
    Wood, Lydia
    Lu, Dong
    Houk, James C.
    Bitan, Tali
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1133 (01) : 136 - 144
  • [9] Cross-modal and non-sensory influences on auditory streaming
    Carlyon, RP
    Plack, CJ
    Fantini, DA
    Cusack, R
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2003, 32 (11) : 1393 - 1402