On the Predictability of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Two-Dimensional Simulations

被引:30
作者
Wandishin, Matthew S. [1 ]
Stensrud, David J. [2 ]
Mullen, Steven L. [1 ]
Wicker, Louis J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Atmospher Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] NOAA, Natl Severe Storms Lab, Norman, OK 73069 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2008WAF2007057.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are a dominant climatological feature of the central United States and are responsible for a substantial fraction of warm season rainfall. Yet very little is known about file predictability of MCSs. To help alleviate this situation, a series of ensemble simulations of an MCS are performed on a two-dimensional, storm-scale (Delta x = 1 km) model. Ensemble member perturbations in wind speed, relative humidity, and instability are based oil current 24-h forecast errors from the North American Model (NAM). The ensemble results thus provide an upper bound on the predictability of mesoscale convective systems within realistic estimates of environmental uncertainty, assuming successful convective initiation. The simulations are assessed by considering all ensemble member a success when it reproduces a convective system of at least 20 km in length (roughly the size of two convective cells) within 100 km on either side of the location of the MCS in the control run. By that standard, MCSs occur roughly 70% of the time for perturbation magnitudes consistent with 24-h forecast errors. Reducing the perturbations for all fields to one-half the 24-h error values increases the MCS success rate to over 90%. The same improvement in forecast accuracy would lead to a 30%-40% reduction in maximum surface wind speed uncertainty and a roughly 20% reduction in the uncertainty in maximum updraft strength, and initially slower growth in the uncertainty, in the size of the MCS. However, the occurrence of MCSs drops below 50% as the midlayer mean relative humidity falls below 65%. The response of the model to reductions in forecast errors for instability, moisture, and wind speed is not consistent and cannot be easily generalized, but each call have a substantial impact on forecast uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 785
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF HELICITY ON EVOLUTION OF ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE AT HIGH REYNOLDS-NUMBER [J].
ANDRE, JC ;
LESIEUR, M .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1977, 81 (JUN9) :187-207
[2]  
BLACK TL, 1994, WEATHER FORECAST, V9, P265, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0265:TNNMEM>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
BROOKS HE, 1993, WEATHER FORECAST, V8, P352, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1993)008<0352:SAFEUA>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Bryan GH, 2003, MON WEATHER REV, V131, P2394, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<2394:RRFTSO>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Bowing convective systems in a popular operational model: Are they for real? [J].
Bukovsky, MS ;
Kain, JS ;
Baldwin, ME .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2006, 21 (03) :307-324
[9]  
Carbone RE, 2002, J ATMOS SCI, V59, P2033, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2033:IOPAWW>2.0.CO
[10]  
2