Bandpass filter settings differentially affect measurement of P50 sensory gating in children and adults

被引:13
作者
Chang, Wen-Pin [2 ]
Gavin, William J. [1 ]
Davies, Patricia L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Creighton Univ, Sch Pharm & Hlth Profess, Dept Occupat Therapy, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Children; Adults; Sensory gating; Event-related potentials; Signal-to-noise ratios; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; SUPPRESSION; EEG; SCHIZOPHRENIA; DEFICIT; N100; INHIBITION; ATTENTION; HZ;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study investigated the effect of four different bandpass filter settings on measures of the P50 component and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of averaged ERPs obtained from a sensory gating paradigm employing paired-click stimuli. Methods: Participants were adults (n = 18) 20-55 years old and children (n = 25) 5-10 years old who were free of neurological disorders. Results: Results show that the filter settings (0.23-75 Hz, 10-50 Hz, 10-75 Hz, and 10-200 Hz) differentially affected the P50 amplitude, noise power and SNR measures of the conditioning and test clicks, and P50 T/C ratios. Conclusions: The 10-50 Hz filter setting may be optimal in studies that include only adults as these settings resulted in the smallest mean P50 T/C ratio, a reasonable standard deviation (SD) for the ratio, and the highest SNRs. The 10-200 Hz filter may be the best for studying young children as this setting had the smallest mean and SD of P50 T/C ratios for these participants. Significance: In studies that include both adults and children investigators are advised to use the 10-200 Hz filter setting because the smaller variability of sensory gating in the child group helps ensure better homogeneity of variance measures between the groups. (C) 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2264 / 2272
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ADLER LE, 1982, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V17, P639
[2]   Reduced gating of middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (P50) in migraine patients: another indication of abnormal sensory processing? [J].
Ambrosini, A ;
De Pasqua, V ;
Afra, J ;
Sandor, PS ;
Schoenen, J .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2001, 306 (1-2) :132-134
[3]   Impaired auditory gating and P50 nonsuppression following traumatic brain injury [J].
Arciniegas, D ;
Olincy, A ;
Topkoff, J ;
McRae, K ;
Cawthra, E ;
Filley, CM ;
Reite, M ;
Adler, LE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2000, 12 (01) :77-85
[4]  
BASAR E, 1987, INT J NEUROSCI, V33, P103
[5]   Lack of blinding in gating studies [J].
Boutros, Nash .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2008, 103 (1-3) :336-336
[6]   Sensory-gating deficit of the N100 mid-latency auditory evoked potential in medicated schizophrenia patients [J].
Boutros, Nash N. ;
Brockhaus-Dumke, Anke ;
Gjini, Klevest ;
Vedeniapin, Andrei ;
Elfakhani, Mohamad ;
Burroughs, Scott ;
Keshavan, Matcheri .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2009, 113 (2-3) :339-346
[7]   Midlatency evoked potentials attenuation and augmentation reflect different aspects of sensory gating [J].
Boutros, NN ;
Belger, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 45 (07) :917-922
[8]   The gamma band response may account for poor P50 suppression in schizophrenia [J].
Clementz, BA ;
Blumenfeld, LD ;
Cobb, S .
NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (18) :3889-3893
[9]   Multichannel electroencephalographic assessment of auditory evoked response suppression in schizophrenia [J].
Clementz, BA ;
Blumenfeld, LD .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 139 (04) :377-390
[10]   P50 suppression among schizophrenia and normal comparison subjects: A methodological analysis [J].
Clementz, BA ;
Geyer, MA ;
Braff, DL .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 41 (10) :1035-1044