Regrowth of spring canola (Brassica napus) after defoliation

被引:12
作者
McCormick, Jeffrey I. [1 ]
Virgona, Jim M. [1 ]
Kirkegaard, John A. [2 ]
机构
[1] EH Graham Ctr Agr Innovat, Wagga Wagga Agr Inst, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
[2] CSIRO Plant Ind, CSIRO Natl Sustainable Agr Flagship, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Oilseed rape; Forage; Dual-purpose; Water soluble carbohydrate; Starch; Grazing; Remobilisation; DRY-MATTER PRODUCTION; DUAL-PURPOSE CANOLA; NITROGEN-FERTILIZER; STRESS TOLERANCE; YIELD COMPONENTS; INDIAN MUSTARD; GROWTH; PROTEIN; STORAGE; CLOVER;
D O I
10.1007/s11104-013-1776-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Regrowth of dual-purpose canola after grazing is important for commercial success and the aim of this research was to investigate the effects of defoliation on the development, growth, photosynthesis and allocation of carbohydrates. We conducted two pot experiments in which defoliation was conducted at multiple intensities with scissors. Experiment 1 determined changes in flowering date due to defoliation while Experiment 2 investigated the effects of defoliation on growth, photosynthesis and allocation of carbohydrates in canola. Time to the appearance of the first flower was delayed by up to 9 days after the removal of all leaves at the start of stem elongation (GS30), and up to 19 days if the elongating bud was also removed. Stem growth rate decreased by 56-86 % due to defoliation and tap roots did not increase in mass when plants were completely defoliated. Leaf area continued to expand at the same rate as in un-defoliated plants. The new leaf area established per gram of regrowth biomass over 20 days was 158 cm(2).g(-1) for the complete defoliation treatments compared with 27 cm(2).g(-1) for the half-defoliated treatment and 13 cm(2).g(-1) for the un-defoliated treatment. Despite a reduction in total biomass of up to 60 %, the proportion of dry matter partitioned to the leaves was 18 % for all treatments within 20 days after defoliation. Total non-structural carbohydrate levels were reduced rapidly in the stem by day two (predominately sucrose) and the tap root by day four (predominately starch) after defoliation and did not recover to match un-defoliated plant levels within 20 days. Residual leaves on defoliated plants maintained photosynthetic rate compared with the same leaf cohorts on un-defoliated plants in which photosynthetic rate decreased to 39 % by day 12. The rapid recovery of leaf area in defoliated canola was facilitated by the sustained high photosynthetic rate in remaining leaves, rapid mobilisation of stored sugars (stem) and starch (root), and a cessation of root and stem growth.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 668
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   TAPROOT CARBOHYDRATE CONCENTRATIONS AND STRESS TOLERANCE OF CONTRASTING ALFALFA GENOTYPES [J].
BOYCE, PJ ;
VOLENEC, JJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (03) :757-761
[2]   EFFECTS OF LEAF REMOVAL ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF BRASSICA-NAPUS [J].
CLARKE, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1978, 58 (04) :1103-1105
[3]   EFFECT OF ROOT/LEAF TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIALS ON ROOT/SHOOT RATIOS IN SOME PASTURE GRASSES AND CLOVER [J].
DAVIDSON, RL .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1969, 33 (131) :561-+
[4]   WHOLE-PLANT RESPONSES OF BRASSICA-CAMPESTRIS (CRUCIFERAE) TO ALTERED SINK-SOURCE RELATIONS [J].
EVANS, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1991, 78 (03) :394-400
[5]   Grazing winter wheat relieves plant water stress and transiently enhances photosynthesis [J].
Harrison, Matthew T. ;
Kelman, Walter M. ;
Moore, Andrew D. ;
Evans, John R. .
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2010, 37 (08) :726-736
[6]   Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments .1. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality [J].
Hocking, PJ ;
Kirkegaard, JA ;
Angus, JF ;
Gibson, AH ;
Koetz, EA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1997, 49 (2-3) :107-125
[7]   Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components [J].
Hocking, PJ ;
Stapper, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (06) :623-634
[8]  
HODGKINSON K C, 1974, Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, V1, P561
[9]  
Khan N.A., 2005, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., V17, P181, DOI 10.1590/S1677-04202005000100015
[10]  
Khan NA, 2003, J FOOD AGRIC ENVIRON, V1, P125