Barriers and facilitators and the need for a clinical guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing in the hospital: a qualitative and quantitative study

被引:8
作者
Bogers, Saskia J. [1 ]
van Daalen, Frederike, V [1 ]
Kuil, Sacha D. [2 ]
de Jong, Menno D. [2 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Med Microbiol, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Antibiotic stewardship programmes; Clinical guidelines; Antimicrobial resistance; Microbiological diagnostic testing; Infectious diseases; Barriers and facilitators; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; INFECTIOUS-DISEASES-SOCIETY; FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW; ADULT PATIENTS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PROGRAM; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10096-019-03516-z
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The appropriate use of microbiological investigations is an important cornerstone of antibiotic stewardship programmes, but receives relatively limited attention. This study aimed to identify influencing factors in performing microbiological diagnostic tests and to assess the need for a clinical guideline. We performed a qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (online questionnaire survey) study among medical specialists and residents to identify physicians' considerations in performing microbiological diagnostic tests and to assess the need for a diagnostic guideline. The questionnaire consisted of 14 statements, divided into three categories: knowledge, influencing factors and presence of guidelines. The questionnaire was sent to physicians of the departments of internal medicine, intensive care, paediatrics and pulmonology in five hospitals in the Netherlands. Sub-analyses for medical specialists versus residents and for paediatric versus non-paediatric departments were performed. We included 187 completed questionnaires in our analyses. The physicians reported having adequate knowledge on methods, time-to-result and accuracy, but inadequate knowledge on costs of the tests. Patients' clinical condition, comorbidity, local guidelines and accuracy of tests were appraised as the four most important influencing factors to perform tests. Over 70% (132/187) of physicians reported being interested in a guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing. Fifteen physicians (8.0%) provided additional comments. This study identifies the influencing factors to microbiological testing and shows the demand for a clinical guideline among physicians. Importance Microbiological diagnostic tests are an important cornerstone within antibiotic stewardship programmes [1-5]. These programmes aim to ameliorate the appropriate use of antibiotics and thus improve clinical outcomes of infectious diseases, whilst reducing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance [6]. However, inappropriate microbiological testing is a widely recognised problem [7-12], and influencing factors to testing have not been studied in the past. Our research shows the demand for a clinical guideline among physicians, and it identifies their influencing factors to testing. These results can be used to create a clinical guideline for microbiological diagnostic testing, thus supporting antibiotic stewardship programmes and reducing antimicrobial resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 920
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, Focus groups as qualitative research
  • [2] Maturation of the adolescent brain
    Arain, Mariam
    Haque, Maliha
    Johal, Lina
    Mathur, Puja
    Nel, Wynand
    Rais, Afsha
    Sandhu, Ranbir
    Sharma, Sushil
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2013, 9 : 449 - 460
  • [3] Barlam TF, 2016, CLIN INFECT DIS, V62, pE51, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciw118
  • [4] FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW - AN UNDERUTILIZED RESEARCH TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING THEORY AND PRACTICE IN HEALTH-EDUCATION
    BASCH, CE
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1987, 14 (04): : 411 - 448
  • [5] Use, Location, and Timeliness of Clinical Microbiology Testing in Georgia for Select Infectious Diseases
    Brzozowski, Amanda K.
    Silk, Benjamin J.
    Berkelman, Ruth L.
    Loveys, Deborah A.
    Caliendo, Angela M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (04) : E4 - E10
  • [6] Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys
    Cunningham, Ceara Tess
    Quan, Hude
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda
    Noseworthy, Tom
    Beck, Cynthia A.
    Dixon, Elijah
    Samuel, Susan
    Ghali, William A.
    Sykes, Lindsay L.
    Jette, Nathalie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [7] Davey P, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub3]
  • [8] Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations
    Fleuren, Margot A. H.
    Paulussen, Theo G. W. M.
    Van Dommelen, Paula
    Van Buuren, Stef
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (05) : 501 - 510
  • [9] A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice
    Flottorp, Signe A.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Krause, Jane
    Musila, Nyokabi R.
    Wensing, Michel
    Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
    Baker, Richard
    Eccles, Martin P.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [10] Microbiological point of care testing before antibiotic prescribing in primary care: considerable variations between practices
    Haldrup, Steffen
    Thomsen, Reimar W.
    Bro, Flemming
    Skov, Robert
    Bjerrum, Lars
    Sogaard, Mette
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 18