Appraisal of SMOS soil moisture at a catchment scale in a temperate maritime climate

被引:53
|
作者
Srivastava, Prashant K. [1 ]
Han, Dawei [1 ]
Ramirez, Miguel A. Rico [1 ]
Islam, Tanvir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Water & Environm Management Res Ctr, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
关键词
SMOS; Water Retention Curve; Soil Moisture Deficit; Probability Distribution Model (PDM); Pedotransfer function; Evapotranspiration; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTIONS; FIELD-CAPACITY; WATER CONTENTS; RUNOFF; RETRIEVAL; MODEL; METHODOLOGY; VARIABILITY; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.021
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Soil moisture is one of the important variables in hydrological modelling, which is now possible to be measured with remote sensing. This study is an attempt to evaluate the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite derived soil moisture for hydrological applications at a catchment scale. The Soil Moisture Deficit (SMD) derived from a Probability Distribution Model is used as a benchmark for all comparisons. Three approaches are used for the evaluation of SMOS soil moisture. The first approach is based on ROSETTA pedotransfer functions (PTFs), while second and the third are based on linear/non-linear and seasonal algorithms particularly for growing and non-growing seasons respectively. The field capacity and permanent wilting point estimated from the simulated Water Retention Curve (WRC) through ROSETTA are used for the transformation of SMOS data into SMD. The growing seasons used in this study belong to the months from March to November, while the non-growing seasons comprise of months from December to February. The highest performance is given by a combined growing and non-growing season algorithms with the Nash Sutcliffe Efficiencies (NSEs) of 0.75 and RMSE = 0.01 m(3)/m(3) followed by the linear and non-linear algorithms (NSE = 0.40-0.42; RMSE = 0.02 m(3)/m(3)). The worst performance is revealed by the PTFs indicating that it should be used with caution for direct coarse scale SMOS applications (NSE = -24.98 to -40.23) and need more treatments regarding the spatial and depth wise mismatch. The overall analysis reveals that SMOS soil moisture is of reasonable quality in estimating Soil Moisture Deficit at a catchment level with a local adjustment algorithm combining growing and non-growing seasons. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 304
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of SWAT simulated soil moisture at catchment scale by field measurements and Landsat derived indices
    Uniyal, Bhumika
    Dietrich, Joerg
    Vasilakos, Christos
    Tzoraki, Ourania
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 : 55 - 70
  • [42] Assessment of SMOS soil moisture retrieval parameters using tau-omega algorithms for soil moisture deficit estimation
    Srivastava, Prashant K.
    Han, Dawei
    Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.
    O'Neill, Peggy
    Islam, Tanvir
    Gupta, Manika
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 519 : 574 - 587
  • [43] Testing the influence of topography and material properties on catchment-scale soil moisture patterns using remotely sensed vegetation patterns in a humid temperate catchment, northern Britain
    Milledge, David Graham
    Warburton, Jeff
    Lane, Stuart N.
    Stevens, Carly J.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2013, 27 (08) : 1223 - 1237
  • [44] Large scale operational soil moisture mapping from passive MW radiometry: SMOS product evaluation in Europe & USA
    Deng, Khidir Abdalla Kwal
    Laraine, Salim
    Pavlides, Andrew
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Bao, Yansong
    Srivastava, Prashant K.
    Guang, Yuanhong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2019, 80 : 206 - 217
  • [45] Modelling soil moisture at SMOS scale by use of a SVAT model over the Valencia Anchor Station
    Juglea, S.
    Kerr, Y.
    Mialon, A.
    Wigneron, J. -P.
    Lopez-Baeza, E.
    Cano, A.
    Albitar, A.
    Millan-Scheiding, C.
    Carmen Antolin, M.
    Delwart, S.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (05) : 831 - 846
  • [46] Performance evaluation of WRF-Noah Land surface model estimated soil moisture for hydrological application: Synergistic evaluation using SMOS retrieved soil moisture
    Srivastava, Prashant K.
    Han, Dawei
    Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.
    O'Neill, Peggy
    Islam, Tanvir
    Gupta, Manika
    Dai, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 : 200 - 212
  • [47] Assimilation of SMOS soil moisture into a distributed hydrological model and impacts on the water cycle variables over the Oueme catchment in Benin
    Leroux, Delphine J.
    Pellarin, Thierry
    Vischel, Theo
    Cohard, Jean-Martial
    Gascon, Tania
    Gibon, Francois
    Mialon, Arnaud
    Galle, Sylvie
    Peugeot, Christophe
    Seguis, Luc
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (07) : 2827 - 2840
  • [48] Seasonal-scale intercomparison of SMAP and fused SMOS-SMAP soil moisture products
    Xing, Zanpin
    Li, Xiaojun
    Fan, Lei
    Frappart, Frederic
    Kim, Hyunglok
    Karthikeyan, Lanka
    Konkathi, Preethi
    Liu, Yuqing
    Zhao, Lin
    Wigneron, Jean-Pierre
    FRONTIERS IN REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 5
  • [49] Evaluation of SMOS soil moisture retrievals over the central United States for hydro-meteorological application
    Zhuo, Lu
    Dai, Qiang
    Han, Dawei
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2015, 83-84 : 146 - 155
  • [50] Self-Correction of Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) Soil Moisture Dry Bias
    Lee, Ju Hyoung
    Cosh, Michael
    Starks, Patrick
    Toth, Zoltan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 45 (06) : 814 - 828