The Promise and Perils of Wearable Sensors in Organizational Research

被引:100
作者
Chaffin, Daniel [1 ]
Heidl, Ralph [2 ]
Hollenbeck, John R. [3 ]
Howe, Michael [7 ]
Yu, Andrew [4 ]
Voorhees, Clay [5 ]
Calantone, Roger [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Kearney, 1917 W 24th St,West Ctr 405C, Kearney, NE 68849 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Mkt, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[7] Iowa State Univ, Management, Ames, IA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
wearable sensors; group research methodology; big data; LEADERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/1094428115617004
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Rapid advances in mobile computing technology have the potential to revolutionize organizational research by facilitating new methods of data collection. The emergence of wearable electronic sensors in particular harbors the promise of making the large-scale collection of high-resolution data related to human interactions and social behavior economically viable. Popular press and practitioner-oriented research outlets have begun to tout the game-changing potential of wearable sensors for both researchers and practitioners. We systematically examine the utility of current wearable sensor technology for capturing behavioral constructs at the individual and team levels. In the process, we provide a model for performing validation work in this new domain of measurement. Our findings highlight the need for organizational researchers to take an active role in the development of wearable sensor systems to ensure that the measures derived from these devices and sensors allow us to leverage and extend the extant knowledge base. We also offer a caution regarding the potential sources of error arising from wearable sensors in behavioral research.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 31
页数:29
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Davidson R.A., 2012, Multiteam Systems: An Organizational Form for Dynamic and Complex Environments, P323
  • [2] DeRue D.S., 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P627
  • [3] Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research
    Donaldson, SI
    Grant-Vallone, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 17 (02) : 245 - 260
  • [4] BIG DATA AND MANAGEMENT
    George, Gerard
    Haas, Martine R.
    Pentland, Alex
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 57 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [5] Greenberg J., 1995, Behavior in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work, V5th
  • [6] Hall E. T., 1966, DOUBLEDAY, V609
  • [7] Hallberg J, 2003, ICT'2003: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLS I AND II, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P954
  • [8] AGGREGATION BIAS IN ESTIMATES OF PERCEPTUAL AGREEMENT
    JAMES, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 67 (02) : 219 - 229
  • [9] ESTIMATING WITHIN-GROUP INTERRATER RELIABILITY WITH AND WITHOUT RESPONSE BIAS
    JAMES, LR
    DEMAREE, RG
    WOLF, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (01) : 85 - 98
  • [10] KENT RL, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P1335, DOI 10.5465/256675