Effects of Soil Solution's Constituents on Proton NMR Relaxometry of Soil Samples

被引:28
作者
Jaeger, Fabian [1 ]
Rudolph, Nicole [2 ]
Lang, Friederike [3 ]
Schaumann, Gabriele E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Sci, Sect Organ & Environm Chem, Dep Chem, D-56072 Koblenz, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Dep Environm Chem, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Ecol, Dep Soil Sci, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2007.0427
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR) relaxometry has been used to analyze pore size distributions of wet porous samples. To make this method applicable to Soil samples, knowledge about contribution from the soil solution to the total proton relaxation is needed. We extracted soil solutions from nine soil samples and determined transverse proton relaxation rates, the concentration of Fe, Mn, and total organic C (TOC), and the pH of the solutions. The effects of Fe, Mn, and TOC on the proton relaxation in the soil solution were compared with those of dissolved Fe2+, Fe3+, and Mn2+ and of glucose, D-cellobiose, potassium hydrogen phthalate, sodium alginate, and agar in model solutions. Proton relaxation rates in the soil solutions were up to 20 times larger than in pure water, which was mainly due to dissolved Fe(III) and Mn(II) species. The relaxivities of Fe and Mn in soil solution were reduced to 40 and 70% compared with Fe(III) and Mn(II) in a model solution, respectively. Smaller relaxivities were primarily due to the formation of metal-organic complexes. We conclude that the proton relaxation in soil samples is generally accelerated by the soil solution, and its contribution must be considered to estimate pore sizes from relaxation times. By using the calculated relaxivities of Fe and Mn in soil solution, the contribution of the soil solution to the total proton relaxation can be estimated from the Fe and Mn concentration in the soil solution.
引用
收藏
页码:1694 / 1707
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Development of soil water repellency in the course of isothermal drying and upon pH changes in two urban soils [J].
Bayer, Julia V. ;
Schaumann, Gabriele E. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2007, 21 (17) :2266-2275
[2]  
BERTERO M, 1993, HANDB STAT, V10, P1
[3]   NUCLEAR AND ELECTRON RELAXATION OF FE(OH2)63+ [J].
BERTINI, I ;
CAPOZZI, F ;
LUCHINAT, C ;
XIA, ZC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 97 (06) :1134-1137
[4]  
Beuling EE, 1998, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V60, P283, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981105)60:3<283::AID-BIT3>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-Q
[6]   PROTON RELAXATION TIMES IN PARAMAGNETIC SOLUTIONS EFFECTS OF ELECTRON SPIN RELAXATION [J].
BLOEMBERGEN, N ;
MORGAN, LO .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1961, 34 (03) :842-&
[7]   Hydration of ions, a function of its electrostatic potential [J].
Brintzinger, H ;
Ratanarat, C ;
Osswald, H .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANORGANISCHE UND ALLGEMEINE CHEMIE, 1935, 223 (01) :101-105
[8]  
BROWN MA, 2005, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V3, P3
[9]   IMPORTANCE OF CLASSICAL DIFFUSION IN NMR-STUDIES OF WATER IN BIOLOGICAL CELLS [J].
BROWNSTEIN, KR ;
TARR, CE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1979, 19 (06) :2446-2453
[10]   Paramagnetic effects of iron(III) species on nuclear magnetic relaxation of fluid protons in porous media [J].
Bryar, TR ;
Daughney, CJ ;
Knight, RJ .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2000, 142 (01) :74-85