Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial

被引:26
|
作者
Mari, Francesco Saverio [1 ]
Di Cesare, Tatiana [1 ]
Novi, Luciano [1 ]
Gasparrini, Marcello [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo [1 ]
Liverani, Andrea [1 ]
Brescia, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci & Translat Med, Sch Med & Psychol,Fac Med & Psychol, I-00189 Rome, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 09期
关键词
Ghost ileostomy; Laparoscopic lower rectal resection; Anterior rectal resection; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic dehiscence; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; COLON-CANCER; STOMA; COMPLICATIONS; CARCINOMA; REVERSAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3974-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection. All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated. Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence. The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:2590 / 2597
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized controlled trial of pelvic calcium alginate following rectal cancer surgery
    Maggiori, L.
    Rullier, E.
    Meyer, C.
    Portier, G.
    Faucheron, J. L.
    Panis, Y.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (04) : 479 - 484
  • [32] Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Sung-Min Lee
    Sung-Bum Kang
    Je-Ho Jang
    Jun-Seok Park
    Samin Hong
    Taek-Gu Lee
    Soyeon Ahn
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 3902 - 3909
  • [33] Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Min Jung
    Park, Sung Chan
    Park, Ji Won
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Nam, Byung-Ho
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 267 (02) : 243 - 251
  • [34] Rectal stimulation with prebiotics and probiotics before ileostomy reversal: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Marília Marcelino
    Francisco Tustumi
    Lucas Soares Gerbasi
    Rafael Vaz Pandini
    Rafaela de Souza Novo
    Marleny Novaes Figueiredo de Araujo
    Elis Oliveira
    Victor Edmond Seid
    Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo
    Trials, 24
  • [35] Does Preoperative Radio(chemo) therapy Increase Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Qin, Changjiang
    Ren, Xuequn
    Xu, Kaiwu
    Chen, Zhihui
    He, Yulong
    Song, Xinming
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 2014
  • [36] Systemic inflammatory response in robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer (SIRIRALS): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
    Cuk, Pedja
    Pedersen, Andreas Kristian
    Lambertsen, Kate Lykke
    Mogensen, Christian Backer
    Nielsen, Michael Festersen
    Helligso, Per
    Gogenur, Ismail
    Ellebaek, Mark Bremholm
    BMC SURGERY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [37] Reoperation after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Does the laparoscopic approach have any advantages?
    Ibanez, Noelia
    Abrisqueta, Jesus
    Lujan, Juan
    Sanchez, Pedro
    Teresa Soriano, Maria
    Arevalo-Perez, Julio
    Parrilla, Pascual
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2018, 96 (02): : 110 - 117
  • [38] Early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial study
    Ahmadi-Amoli, Hadi
    Rahimi, Mohsen
    Abedi-kichi, Raziyeh
    Ebrahimian, Nazli
    Hosseiniasl, Seyed-Mohammad
    Hajebi, Reza
    Rahimpour, Ehsan
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [39] Quality assurance of pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for advanced lower rectal cancer-preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial
    Masaki, Tadahiko
    Matsuoka, Hiroyoshi
    Kobayashi, Takaaki
    Abe, Nobutsugu
    Takayama, Makoto
    Tonari, Ayako
    Sugiyama, Masanori
    Atomi, Yutaka
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 395 (06) : 607 - 613
  • [40] Early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial study
    Hadi Ahmadi-Amoli
    Mohsen Rahimi
    Raziyeh Abedi-kichi
    Nazli Ebrahimian
    Seyed-Mohammad Hosseiniasl
    Reza Hajebi
    Ehsan Rahimpour
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408