Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial

被引:25
|
作者
Mari, Francesco Saverio [1 ]
Di Cesare, Tatiana [1 ]
Novi, Luciano [1 ]
Gasparrini, Marcello [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo [1 ]
Liverani, Andrea [1 ]
Brescia, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci & Translat Med, Sch Med & Psychol,Fac Med & Psychol, I-00189 Rome, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 09期
关键词
Ghost ileostomy; Laparoscopic lower rectal resection; Anterior rectal resection; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic dehiscence; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; COLON-CANCER; STOMA; COMPLICATIONS; CARCINOMA; REVERSAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3974-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection. All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated. Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence. The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:2590 / 2597
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial
    Francesco Saverio Mari
    Tatiana Di Cesare
    Luciano Novi
    Marcello Gasparrini
    Giammauro Berardi
    Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca
    Andrea Liverani
    Antonio Brescia
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 2590 - 2597
  • [2] Role of diversion ileostomy in low rectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial
    Thoker, Mukhtar
    Wani, Imtiaz
    Parray, Fazl Q.
    Khan, Nawab
    Mir, Shabeer A.
    Thoker, Parvaiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 (09) : 945 - 951
  • [3] Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Surgery: Role of the Ghost Ileostomy
    Palumbo, Piergaspare
    Usai, Sofia
    Pansa, Andrea
    Lucchese, Sara
    Caronna, Roberto
    Bona, Stefano
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (06) : 2975 - 2983
  • [4] Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Kim, Sohyun
    Jung, Sang Hun
    Kim, Jae Hwang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (05) : 811 - 819
  • [5] Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection
    Ihnat, Peter
    Gunkova, Petra
    Peteja, Matus
    Vavra, Petr
    Pelikan, Anton
    Zonca, Pavel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (11): : 4809 - 4816
  • [6] Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Shu
    Lin, Yuting
    Zhong, Wenjin
    Xu, Wenji
    Huang, Zhongxin
    Cai, Suqin
    Chen, Wen
    Zhang, Baogen
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (03)
  • [7] Closure of Temporary Ileostomy 2 Versus 12 Weeks After Rectal Resection for Cancer A Word of Caution From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Elsner, Andreas T.
    Brosi, Philippe
    Walensi, Mikolaj
    Uhlmann, Michael
    Egger, Bernhard
    Glaser, Christine
    Maurer, Christoph A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (11) : 1398 - 1406
  • [8] A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    Deijen, Charlotte L.
    Abis, Gabor A.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M.
    de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
    Lacy, Antonio M.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Andersson, John
    Angenete, Eva
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    Fuerst, Alois
    Haglind, Eva
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14): : 1324 - 1332
  • [9] Laparoscopic anterior resection with or without transanal tube for rectal cancer patients - A multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Tamura, Koichi
    Matsuda, Kenji
    Horiuchi, Tetsuya
    Noguchi, Kohei
    Hotta, Tsukasa
    Takifuji, Katsunari
    Iwahashi, Makoto
    Iwamoto, Hiromitsu
    Mizumoto, Yuki
    Yamaue, Hiroki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 222 (03): : 606 - 612
  • [10] Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Lee, Sung-Min
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Jang, Je-Ho
    Park, Jun-Seok
    Hong, Samin
    Lee, Taek-Gu
    Ahn, Soyeon
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (10): : 3902 - 3909