Evaluating the rate and risk factors for fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling

被引:47
作者
Odibo, Anthony O. [1 ]
Dicke, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Gray, Diana L. [1 ]
Oberle, Barbara [1 ]
Stamilio, David M. [1 ]
Macones, George A. [1 ]
Crane, James P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med Ultrasound & Genet, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181875b92
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the fetal loss rate in our center and evaluate the risk factors associated with such losses after chorionic villus sampling (CVS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all women undergoing chorionic villus sampling and a control group that had no invasive procedure at a single center over a 16-year period. Fetal loss was defined as any loss before 24 weeks of gestation. Univariable and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to compare pregnancies resulting in fetal loss to those without a loss and to adjust for potential confounders between the groups. RESULTS: Of 5,243 women who had CVS who were compared with 4,917 women seen before 14 weeks who had no invasive procedure, there were 138 (2.7%) fetal losses before 24 weeks of gestation in the CVS group compared with 161 (3.3%) in the control group (relative risk 0.80, 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.0). The difference in loss rate of -0.7% (95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 1.3) between the CVS group and those who had no procedure was not statistically significant at P<.05. The significant risk factors for fetal loss were African-American maternal race, at least two aspirations/needle insertions, heavy bleeding during CVS, maternal age younger than 25 years, and gestational age at performing CVS before 10 weeks. CONCLUSION: The estimated fetal loss rate after CVS was not significantly different from the group that had no procedure. Significant predictors of fetal loss after CVS were identified, but the accuracy of the final model for predicting fetal loss was only modest.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 819
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, V97, P1
[2]   Early second trimester (13 to 20 weeks) transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS): a safe and alternative method for both high and low risk populations [J].
Brambati, B ;
Tului, L ;
Camurri, L ;
Guercilena, S .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2002, 22 (10) :907-913
[3]   RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF TRANSABDOMINAL VERSUS TRANSCERVICAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING METHODS [J].
BRAMBATI, B ;
TERZIAN, E ;
TOGNONI, G .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1991, 11 (05) :285-293
[4]   Feasibility, accuracy and safety of chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10741 cases [J].
Brun, JL ;
Mangione, R ;
Gangbo, F ;
Guyon, F ;
Taine, L ;
Roux, D ;
Maugey-Laulom, B ;
Horovitz, J ;
Saura, R .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (04) :295-301
[5]   Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss [J].
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Hopkins, Linda M. ;
Norton, Mary E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03) :612-616
[6]  
Cederholm M, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P311, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199704)17:4<311::AID-PD53>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-I
[8]   COMPARISON OF TRANSCERVICAL AND TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING LOSS RATES IN 9000 CASES FROM A SINGLE-CENTER [J].
CHUEH, JT ;
GOLDBERG, JD ;
WOHLFERD, MM ;
GOLBUS, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) :1277-1282
[9]   SEVERE LIMB ABNORMALITIES AFTER CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING AT 56-66 DAYS GESTATION [J].
FIRTH, HV ;
BOYD, PA ;
CHAMBERLAIN, P ;
MACKENZIE, IZ ;
LINDENBAUM, RH ;
HUSON, SM .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8744) :762-763
[10]  
Gindler J. S., 1995, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V44, P1