Drivers of selectivity in family firms: Understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR

被引:42
作者
Madden, Laura [1 ]
McMillan, Amy [2 ]
Harris, Oneil [3 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Coll Business, Dept Management, 3108 Bate Bldg, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Coll Business, Dept Management, 3105 Bate Bldg, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[3] East Carolina Univ, Coll Business, Dept Finance, 3135 Bate Bldg, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; CSR; Socioemotional selectivity theory; Family firms; Age; Ownership; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER SALIENCE; ORIENTATION; GOVERNANCE; STRATEGY; ENGAGEMENT; STOCK; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100335
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A family firm's decision to engage in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a complex one, and many contradictory findings exist to explain why a firm invests in CSR. Socioemotional selectivity theory (SEST) suggests that family firms' selectivity changes over time, which affects their relationships and therefore their engagement in CSR. To study these effects, we examined 1436 family and non-family firms over an eight-year period to show that ownership structure (family vs. non-family firm) and age drive CSR engagement. While family firms are more likely to invest in CSR activities than non-family firms, we found that as family firms age, this changes. In fact, as family firms age, they become more selective and invest less heavily in CSR activities. Our findings highlight the importance of studying the heterogeneity in firm-level investments in CSR as well as the impact of selectivity on their strategic investments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Adams J.S., 1996, Family Business Review, V9, P157, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1996.00157.X
[2]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[3]   Dual class firms: Capitalization, ownership structure and recapitalization back into single class [J].
Amoako-Adu, B ;
Smith, BF .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2001, 25 (06) :1083-1111
[4]   The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms [J].
Arregle, Jean-Luc ;
Hitt, Michael A. ;
Sirmon, David G. ;
Very, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2007, 44 (01) :73-95
[5]   The Relationship between Firm Size and Age, and Its Social Responsibility Actions-Focus on a Developing Country (Romania) [J].
Badulescu, Alina ;
Badulescu, Daniel ;
Saveanu, Tomina ;
Hatos, Roxana .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
[6]   Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders [J].
Barnea, Amir ;
Rubin, Amir .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 97 (01) :71-86
[7]  
Bebchuk LA, 2000, CONCENTRATED CORPORATE OWNERSHIP, P295
[8]   What Matters in Corporate Governance? [J].
Bebchuk, Lucian ;
Cohen, Alma ;
Ferrell, Allen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) :783-827
[9]   Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Cruz, Cristina ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. ;
Larraza-Kintana, Martin .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 55 (01) :82-113
[10]   Strengthening Stakeholder-Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives [J].
Bhattacharya, C. B. ;
Korschun, Daniel ;
Sen, Sankar .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 85 :257-272