Lifecycle Environmental Impact Assessment of an Overtopping Wave Energy Converter Embedded in Breakwater Systems

被引:31
作者
Patrizi, Nicoletta [1 ]
Pulselli, Riccardo M. [1 ]
Neri, Elena [1 ]
Niccolucci, Valentina [1 ]
Vicinanza, Diego [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Contestabile, Pasquale [2 ,3 ]
Bastianoni, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Earth Environm & Phys Sci, Ecodynam Grp, Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Engn, Aversa, Italy
[3] Interuniv Natl Consortium Marine Sci CoNISMa, Rome, Italy
[4] Stn Zool Anton Dohm, Naples, Italy
关键词
blue energy; Life Cycle Assessment; Carbon Footprint; Carbon Intensity of Electricity; environmental investment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; OCEAN; FUTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; PROSPECTS; TRAGEDY; COMMONS; DESIGN; STATE;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2019.00032
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Overtopping breakwater systems are among the most promising technologies for exploiting wave energy to generate electricity. They consist in water reservoirs, embedded in piers, placed on top of ramps, higher than sea-level. Pushed by wave energy, seawater fills up the reservoirs and produces electricity by flowing back down through low headhydro turbines. Different overtopping breakwater systems have been tested worldwide in recent years. This study focuses on the Overtopping BReakwater for Energy Conversion (OBREC) system that has been implemented and tested in the harbor of Naples (Italy). The Life Cycle Assessment of a single replicable module of OBREC has been performed for analyzing potential environmental impacts, in terms of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, considering construction, installation, maintenance, and the operational phases. The Carbon Footprint (i.e., mass of CO(2)eq) to build wave energy converters integrated in breakwater systems has been estimated, more specifically the "environmental investment" (i.e., the share of Carbon Footprint due to the integration of wave energy converter) needed to generate renewable electricity has been assessed. The Carbon Intensity of Electricity (i.e., the ratio between the CO(2)eq emitted and the electricity produced) has been then assessed in order to demonstrate the profitability and the opportunity to foster innovation in the field of blue energy. Considering the impact for implementing an operational OBREC module (Carbon Footprint = 1.08 t CO(2)eq; Environmental Investment = 0.48 t CO(2)eq) and the electricity production (12.6 MWh/year per module), environmental benefits (avoided emissions) would compensate environmental costs (i.e., Carbon Footprint; Environmental Investment) those provided within a range of 25 and 13 months respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   An empirical evaluation of the sea depth effects for various wave characteristics on the performance of a point absorber wave energy converter [J].
Alamian, Rezvan ;
Shafaghat, Rouzbeh ;
Shadloo, Mostafa Safdari ;
Bayani, Rasoul ;
Amouei, Hossein .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2017, 137 :13-21
[2]   Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations [J].
Amponsah, Nana Yaw ;
Troldborg, Mads ;
Kington, Bethany ;
Aalders, Inge ;
Hough, Rupert Lloyd .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :461-475
[3]   Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: A global analysis [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Su, Bin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 94 :56-63
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GREEN EC BLUE WORLD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, BP ENERGY OUTLOOK 20
[6]  
[Anonymous], REN EN CLIM CHANG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GREEN PAPER 2030 FRA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, World Energy Outlook 2014, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264277854-EN, DOI 10.1016/0301-4215(73)90024-4, 10.1787/9789264277854-en]
[9]  
Azzellino A., 2011, 21 INT OFFSH POL ENG
[10]  
Banerjee S., 2013, J APPL NAT SCI, V5, P535