A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients

The purpose of the study was to investigate the accuracy of two corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Corvis Scheimpflug Technology (CST)-IOPpachy and by corneal compensated lOP (IOPcc) using the Reichert 7CR (7CR) tonometers. We also investigated the effects of corneal anatomical and structural parameters on the lOP measurements. The participants included 90 primary open-angle glaucoma patients. We assessed the lOP measurements, obtained by the CST, 7CR, and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), using a paired t-test with Bonferroni correction, Bland-Altman plots, and multiple regression analyses. The 7CR-IOPcc gave the highest value (15.5 +/- 2.7 mmHg), followed by the 7CR-IOPg (13.7 3.1 mmHg), GAT-IOP (13.6 +/- 2.2 mmHg), CST-IOP (10.3 +/- 2.6 mmHg), and CST-IOPpachy (9.7 +/- 2.5 mmHg). The values of CST-IOPpachy were significantly lower than those obtained by the other lOP measurement methods (all, p < 0.01). The values of 7CR-IOPcc were significantly higher than those obtained by the other lOP measurement methods (all, p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference between the GAT-IOP and the other lOP measurements (CST-IOP, CST-IOPpachy, 7CR-IOPg, and 7CR-IOPcc), which were -3.20, -3.82, 0.14, and 2.00 mmHg, respectively. The widths of the 95% limits of agreement between all pairs of IOP measurements were greater than 3 mmHg. With the exception of the 7CR-IOPcc, all of the lOP variations were explained by regression coefficients involving gender, average corneal curvature, and central corneal thickness. The lOP values obtained by the GAT, CST, and 7CR were not interchangeable. Each new IOP measurement device that was corrected for ocular structure had its own limitations.