Genotoxicity of nanomaterials: Refining strategies and tests for hazard identification

被引:38
作者
Pfuhler, Stefan [1 ]
Elespuru, Rosalie [2 ]
Aardema, Marilyn J. [3 ]
Doak, Shareen H. [4 ]
Donner, E. Maria [5 ]
Honma, Masamitsu [6 ]
Kirsch-Volders, Micheline [7 ]
Landsiedel, Robert [8 ]
Manjanatha, Mugimane [9 ]
Singer, Tim [10 ]
Kim, James H. [11 ]
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Innovat Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] US FDA, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Marilyn Aardema Consulting LLC, Fairfield, OH USA
[4] Swansea Univ, Coll Med, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[5] DuPont Haskell Global Ctr Hlth & Environm Sci, Newark, DE USA
[6] Natl Inst Hlth Sci, Setagaya Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[8] BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[9] US FDA, Jefferson, AZ USA
[10] Hlth Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L2, Canada
[11] ILSI Hlth & Environm Sci Inst, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
nanomaterials; workshop; genotoxicity; ALUMINUM-OXIDE NANOMATERIALS; IN-VITRO; DNA-DAMAGE; NANOPARTICLES; INDUCTION; CELLS; MUTAGENICITY; ANEUPLOIDY; MUTATION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1002/em.21770
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A workshop addressing strategies for the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials (NMs) was held on October 23, 2010 in Fort Worth Texas, USA. The workshop was organized by the Environmental Mutagen Society and the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. The workshop was attended by more than 80 participants from academia, regulatory agencies, and industry from North America, Europe and Japan. A plenary session featured summaries of the current status and issues related to the testing of NMs for genotoxic properties, as well as an update on international activities and regulatory approaches. This was followed by breakout sessions and a plenary session devoted to independent discussions of in vitro assays, in vivo assays, and the need for new assays or new approaches to develop a testing strategy for NMs. Each of the standard assays was critiqued as a resource for evaluation of NMs, and it became apparent that none was appropriate without special considerations or modifications. The need for nanospecific positive controls was questioned, as was the utility of bacterial assays. The latter was thought to increase the importance of including mammalian cell gene mutation assays into the test battery. For in-vivo testing, to inform the selection of appropriate tests or protocols, it was suggested to run repeated dose studies first to learn about disposition, potential accumulation, and possible tissue damage. It was acknowledged that mechanisms may be at play that a standard genotoxicity battery may not be able to capture. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 54:229239, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 239
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   In vitro mutagenicity assessment of aluminium oxide nanomaterials using the Salmonella/microsome assay [J].
Balasubramanyam, A. ;
Sailaja, N. ;
Mahboob, M. ;
Rahman, M. F. ;
Hussain, Saber M. ;
Grover, Paramjit .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2010, 24 (06) :1871-1876
[2]   In vivo genotoxicity assessment of aluminium oxide nanomaterials in rat peripheral blood cells using the comet assay and micronucleus test [J].
Balasubramanyam, A. ;
Sailaja, N. ;
Mahboob, M. ;
Rahman, M. F. ;
Hussain, Saber M. ;
Grover, Paramjit .
MUTAGENESIS, 2009, 24 (03) :245-251
[3]  
Bhabra G, 2009, NAT NANOTECHNOL, V4, P876, DOI [10.1038/NNANO.2009.313, 10.1038/nnano.2009.313]
[4]   Investigating Oxidative DNA damage and its repair using the comet assay [J].
Collins, Andrew R. .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2009, 681 (01) :24-32
[5]   Comparative study of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of titanium oxide and aluminium oxide nanoparticles in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells [J].
Di Virgilio, A. L. ;
Reigosa, M. ;
Arnal, P. M. ;
Fernandez Lorenzo de Mele, M. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 177 (1-3) :711-718
[6]   In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines [J].
Doak, S. H. ;
Manshian, B. ;
Jenkins, G. J. S. ;
Singh, N. .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2012, 745 (1-2) :104-111
[7]   Confounding experimental considerations in nanogenotoxicology [J].
Doak, S. H. ;
Griffiths, S. M. ;
Manshian, B. ;
Singh, N. ;
Williams, P. M. ;
Brown, A. P. ;
Jenkins, G. J. S. .
MUTAGENESIS, 2009, 24 (04) :285-293
[8]   Mechanistic influences for mutation induction curves after exposure to DNA-reactive carcinogens [J].
Doak, Shareen H. ;
Jenkins, Gareth J. S. ;
Johnson, George E. ;
Quick, Emma ;
Parry, Elizabeth M. ;
Parry, James M. .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 67 (08) :3904-3911
[9]   Silica nanoparticles administered at the maximum tolerated dose induce genotoxic effects through an inflammatory reaction while gold nanoparticles do not [J].
Downs, Thomas R. ;
Crosby, Meredith E. ;
Hu, Ting ;
Kumar, Shyam ;
Sullivan, Ashley ;
Sarlo, Katherine ;
Reeder, Bob ;
Lynch, Matt ;
Wagner, Matthew ;
Mills, Tim ;
Pfuhler, Stefan .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2012, 745 (1-2) :38-50
[10]   Effects of particle exposure and particle-elicited inflammatory cells on mutation in rat alveolar epithelial cells [J].
Driscoll, KE ;
Deyo, LC ;
Carter, JM ;
Howard, BW ;
Hassenbein, DG ;
Bertram, TA .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1997, 18 (02) :423-430