Computational prediction models for assessing endocrine disrupting potential of chemicals

被引:21
作者
Sakkiah, Sugunadevi [1 ]
Guo, Wenjing [1 ]
Pan, Bohu [1 ]
Kusko, Rebecca [2 ]
Tong, Weida [1 ]
Hong, Huixiao [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Bioinformat & Biostat, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Jefferson, AR USA
[2] Immuneering Corp, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
endocrine disrupting chemicals; androgen receptor; estrogen receptor; alpha-fetoprotein; Human sex hormone binding globulin; quantitative structure-activity relationship; FIELD ANALYSIS COMFA; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR BINDING; LARGE DIVERSE SET; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATION; ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN; ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS; NONSTEROIDAL LIGANDS; 4D-QSAR ANALYSIS; DECISION FOREST; QSAR MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/10590501.2018.1537132
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) mimic natural hormones and disrupt endocrine function. Humans and wildlife are exposed to EDCs might alter endocrine functions through various mechanisms and lead to an adverse effects. Hence, EDCs identification is important to protect the ecosystem and to promote the public health. Leveraging in-vitro and in-vivo experiments to identify potential EDCs is time consuming and expensive. Hence, quantitative structure-activity relationship is applied to screen the potential EDCs. Here, we summarize the predictive models developed using various algorithms to forecast the binding activity of chemicals to the estrogen and androgen receptors, alpha-fetoprotein, and sex hormone binding globulin.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 218
页数:27
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   A ligand-based comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and homology model based molecular docking studies on 3′, 4′-dihydroxyflavones as rat 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors: Design of new inhibitors [J].
Ahamed, T. K. Shameera ;
Muraleedharan, K. .
COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 71 :188-200
[2]   AN INTRODUCTION TO KERNEL AND NEAREST-NEIGHBOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION [J].
ALTMAN, NS .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) :175-185
[3]   SEX-HORMONE-BINDING GLOBULIN [J].
ANDERSON, DC .
CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1974, 3 (01) :69-96
[4]  
AOYAGI Y, 1978, CANCER RES, V38, P3483
[5]   13C NMR quantitative spectrometric data-activity relationship (QSDAR) models of steroids binding the aromatase enzyme [J].
Beger, RD ;
Buzatu, DA ;
Wilkes, JG ;
Lay, JO .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2001, 41 (05) :1360-1366
[6]   State of the Science of Endocrine Disruptors [J].
Birnbaum, Linda S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 121 (04) :A107-A107
[7]   A ligand-based approach to identify quantitative structure-activity relationships for the androgen receptor [J].
Bohl, CE ;
Chang, C ;
Mohler, ML ;
Chen, JY ;
Miller, DD ;
Swaan, PW ;
Dalton, JT .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (15) :3765-3776
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   Computational Study of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Antagonist with Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Support Vector Regression, and Linear Regression Methods [J].
Chang, Ying-Hsin ;
Chen, Jun-Yan ;
Hor, Chiou-Yi ;
Chuang, Yu-Chung ;
Yang, Chang-Biau ;
Yang, Chia-Ning .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 2013
[10]   Near neighbor searching with K nearest references [J].
Chavez, E. ;
Graff, M. ;
Navarro, G. ;
Tellez, E. S. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 51 :43-61