Robot-assisted coelioscopic proximal tubal reanastomosis

被引：0

作者：

Carbonnel, M. ^{[1
]}

Roulot, A. ^{[1
]}

Fay, S. ^{[1
]}

Ayoubi, J. -M. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Hop Foch, Serv Gynecol Obstet, F-92151 Suresnes, France

来源：

GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE | 2013年 / 41卷 / 01期

关键词：

Robot; Da Vinci; Coelioscopy; Microsurgery; Tubal anastomosis; ANASTOMOSIS; STERILIZATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; REVERSAL; STILL;

D O I：

10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.02.011

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

We report two cases of robot-assisted coelioscopic proximal tubal reanastomosis after proximal tubal ligature. Patients were aged 43 and 34 years respectively and had previously undergone proximal tubal ligation by coagulation section at 37 years of age for the first patient, and by Filshie clip at 24 years for the second one. Both had regular menstrual cycles and their ovarian reserve was good. Their partners were presenting with normal sperm criteria. Proximal tubal reanastomosis was carried out in September 2010 by robotic coelioscopy with five extramucous vicryl 5-0 stitches on each tube and positive blue testing. Total durations of the interventions were 200 and 220 minutes respectively. Postoperative outcomes were simple and patients had spontaneous pregnancy at 4 and 2.5 months respectively. Both pregnancies show normal progress currently. This is a contribution to literature data meant to determine the role of robotics in proximal tubal reanastomosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：54 / 57

页数：4

共 20 条

[1]

[Anonymous], WORLD CONTR US 2007

[2] Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study [J].

Caillet, Martin ;

Vandromme, Jean ;

Rozenberg, Serge ;

Paesmans, Marianne ;

Germay, Olivier ;

Degueldre, Michel .

FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (05) :1844-1847

[3] Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy [J].

Cha, SH ;

Lee, MH ;

Kim, JH ;

Lee, CN ;

Yoon, TK ;

Cha, KY .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2001, 8 (03) :348-352

[4] Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review [J].

Deffieux, Xavier ;

Surroca, Michele Morin ;

Faivre, Erika ;

Pages, Frederique ;

Fernandez, Herve ;

Gervaise, Amelie .

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 283 (05) :1149-1158

[5] LAPAROSCOPIC TUBAL ANASTOMOSIS (THE ONE STITCH TECHNIQUE) - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS [J].

DUBUISSON, JB ;

SWOLIN, K .

HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (08) :2044-2046

[6] Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance [J].

Goldberg, JM ;

Falcone, T .

HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (01) :145-147

[7] Essure® implants for tubal sterilisation in France [J].

Grosdemouge, I. ;

Engrand, J. -B. ;

Dhainault, C. ;

Marchand, F. ;

Martigny, H. ;

Thevenot, J. ;

Villefranque, V. ;

Lopes, P. ;

Panel, P. .

GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2009, 37 (05) :389-395

[8]

*HAS, 2008, AN TUB TUB COEL LAP

[9] Microsurgical tubal desterilization: An efficient procedure. Evaluation of a 42 cases cohort according to Guzick's biparametric method [J].

Hoffmann, P. ;

Racinet, C. ;

Bringer, S. ;

Desmons, F. ;

Ayoubi, J. -M. .

GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2010, 38 (01) :6-12

[10] What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? [J].

Lenihan, John P., Jr. ;

Kovanda, Carol ;

Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha .

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) :589-594

← 1 2 →