Size does matter! Perceptual stimulus properties affect event-related potentials during feedback processing

被引:36
作者
Pfabigan, Daniela M. [1 ]
Sailer, Uta [2 ]
Lamm, Claus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Basic Psychol Res & Res Methods, Social Cognit & Affect Neurosci Unit, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, Fac Social Sci, S-40020 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
FRN; P300; Stimulus size; Perceptual salience; Early visual ERPs; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; REWARD PREDICTION; BRAIN POTENTIALS; NEGATIVITY; VALENCE; SENSITIVITY; EXPECTANCY; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.12458
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The current study investigated whether or not the physical aspect of stimulus size has an effect on neuronal correlates of feedback processing. A time estimation task was administered applying three different feedback stimulus categories: small, middle, and large size stimuli. Apart from early visual ERPs such as P1 and N1 components, later feedback processing stages were also affected by the size of feedback stimuli. In particular, small size stimuli compared to middle and large size ones led to diminished amplitudes in both FRN and P300 components, despite intact discrimination between negative and positive outcomes in these two ERPs. In contrast, time estimation performance was not influenced by feedback size. The current results indicate that small size feedback stimuli were perceived as less salient and hence were processed less deeply than the others. This suggests that future feedback studies could manipulate feedback salience simply by presenting differently sized feedback stimuli, at least when the focus lies on FRN and P300 amplitude variation.
引用
收藏
页码:1238 / 1247
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS TO DIFFERENT FEEDBACK STIMULI [J].
CHWILLA, DJ ;
BRUNIA, CHM .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 28 (02) :123-132
[22]   The choice levels modulate outcome processing during outcome independent of behavior selection: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Zhang, Liping ;
Qi, Guomei ;
Long, Changquan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 169 :44-54
[23]   Effects of aging and involuntary capture of attention on event-related potentials associated with the processing of and the response to a target stimulus [J].
Cid-Fernandez, Susana ;
Lindin, Monica ;
Diaz, Fernando .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
[24]   Distributed Patterns of Event-Related Potentials Predict Subsequent Ratings of Abstract Stimulus Attributes [J].
Bode, Stefan ;
Bennett, Daniel ;
Stahl, Jutta ;
Murawski, Carsten .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10)
[25]   Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing [J].
Taylor, Brittany K. ;
Gavin, William J. ;
Grimm, Kevin J. ;
Prince, Mark A. ;
Lin, Mei-Heng ;
Davies, Patricia L. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2019, 132
[26]   Processing of global and local properties——An analysis with event-related brain potentials [J].
韩世辉 ;
陈霖 .
Science in China(Series C:Life Sciences), 1996, (02) :179-188
[27]   Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials [J].
Pfabigan, Daniela M. ;
Alexopoulos, Johanna ;
Bauer, Herbert ;
Sailer, Uta .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (05) :656-664
[28]   Processing of global and local properties - An analysis with event-related brain potentials [J].
Han, SH ;
Chen, L .
SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES C-LIFE SCIENCES, 1996, 39 (02) :179-188
[29]   Disentangling conscious from unconscious cognitive processing with event-related EEG potentials [J].
Rohaut, B. ;
Naccache, L. .
REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2017, 173 (7-8) :521-528
[30]   Reduced sensitivity to neutral feedback versus negative feedback in subjects with mild depression: Evidence from event-related potentials study [J].
Li Peng ;
Song Xinxin ;
Wang Jing ;
Zhou Xiaoran ;
Li Jiayi ;
Lin Fengtong ;
Hu Zhonghua ;
Zhang Xinxin ;
Cui Hewei ;
Wang Wenmiao ;
Li Hong ;
Cong Fengyu ;
Roberson, Debi .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2015, 100 :15-20