Size does matter! Perceptual stimulus properties affect event-related potentials during feedback processing

被引:38
作者
Pfabigan, Daniela M. [1 ]
Sailer, Uta [2 ]
Lamm, Claus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Basic Psychol Res & Res Methods, Social Cognit & Affect Neurosci Unit, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, Fac Social Sci, S-40020 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
FRN; P300; Stimulus size; Perceptual salience; Early visual ERPs; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; REWARD PREDICTION; BRAIN POTENTIALS; NEGATIVITY; VALENCE; SENSITIVITY; EXPECTANCY; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.12458
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The current study investigated whether or not the physical aspect of stimulus size has an effect on neuronal correlates of feedback processing. A time estimation task was administered applying three different feedback stimulus categories: small, middle, and large size stimuli. Apart from early visual ERPs such as P1 and N1 components, later feedback processing stages were also affected by the size of feedback stimuli. In particular, small size stimuli compared to middle and large size ones led to diminished amplitudes in both FRN and P300 components, despite intact discrimination between negative and positive outcomes in these two ERPs. In contrast, time estimation performance was not influenced by feedback size. The current results indicate that small size feedback stimuli were perceived as less salient and hence were processed less deeply than the others. This suggests that future feedback studies could manipulate feedback salience simply by presenting differently sized feedback stimuli, at least when the focus lies on FRN and P300 amplitude variation.
引用
收藏
页码:1238 / 1247
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor [J].
Alexander, William H. ;
Brown, Joshua W. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (10) :1338-U163
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Event related potentials : A methods handbook
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, Pictures of facial affect
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, A5 U FLOR CTR RES PS
[5]   Acute noise stress impairs feedback processing [J].
Banis, Stella ;
Lorist, Monicque M. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 91 (02) :163-171
[6]   Font Size Matters-Emotion and Attention in Cortical Responses to Written Words [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Sommer, Werner ;
Schacht, Annekathrin .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05)
[7]   AN INFORMATION MAXIMIZATION APPROACH TO BLIND SEPARATION AND BLIND DECONVOLUTION [J].
BELL, AJ ;
SEJNOWSKI, TJ .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (06) :1129-1159
[8]   Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity [J].
Bellebaum, Christian ;
Daum, Irene .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 27 (07) :1823-1835
[9]   Brain potentials in perception: Picture complexity and emotional arousal [J].
Bradley, Margaret M. ;
Hamby, Steven ;
Low, Andreas ;
Lang, Peter J. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (03) :364-373
[10]   Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response [J].
Busch, NA ;
Debener, S ;
Kranczioch, C ;
Engel, AK ;
Herrmann, CS .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (08) :1810-1820