Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support

被引:75
作者
Miller, Kristen [1 ]
Mosby, Danielle [1 ]
Capan, Muge [2 ]
Kowalski, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Ratwani, Raj [1 ]
Noaiseh, Yaman [3 ]
Kraft, Rachel [2 ]
Schwartz, Sanford [4 ]
Weintraub, William S. [5 ]
Arnold, Ryan [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Hlth, Natl Ctr Human Factors Healthcare, Washington, DC USA
[2] Value Inst, Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Newark, DE USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Hlth Care Management, Wharton, PA USA
[5] MedStar Hlth, MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[6] Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Newark, DE USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
design features; CDSS; interface; information; interaction; heuristics; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; MEDICATION ALERTS; SYSTEMS; CARE; TECHNOLOGY; PRINCIPLES; GUIDELINES; PHYSICIANS; USABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocx118
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: Provider acceptance and associated patient outcomes are widely discussed in the evaluation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs), but critical design criteria for tools have generally been overlooked. The objective of this work is to inform electronic health record alert optimization and clinical practice workflow by identifying, compiling, and reporting design recommendations for CDSS to support the efficient, effective, and timely delivery of high-quality care. Material and Methods: A narrative review was conducted from 2000 to 2016 in PubMed and The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society to identify papers that discussed/recommended design features of CDSSs that are associated with the success of these systems. Results: Fourteen papers were included as meeting the criteria and were found to have a total of 42 unique recommendations; 11 were classified as interface features, 10 as information features, and 21 as interaction features. Discussion: Features are defined and described, providing actionable guidance that can be applied to CDSS development and policy. To our knowledge, no reviews have been completed that discuss/recommend design features of CDSS at this scale, and thus we found that this was important for the body of literature. The recommendations identified in this narrative review will help to optimize design, organization, management, presentation, and utilization of information through presentation, content, and function. The designation of 3 categories (interface, information, and interaction) should be further evaluated to determine the critical importance of the categories. Future work will determine how to prioritize them with limited resources for designers and developers in order to maximize the clinical utility of CDSS. Conclusion: This review will expand the field of knowledge and provide a novel organization structure to identify key recommendations for CDSS.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 592
页数:8
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J PATIENT SAF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MANAG HLTHC EXEC
[3]   Evaluation of a computerized diagnostic decision support system for patients with pneumonia: Study design considerations [J].
Aronsky, D ;
Chan, KJ ;
Haug, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2001, 8 (05) :473-485
[4]   Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors [J].
Ash, JS ;
Berg, M ;
Coiera, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2004, 11 (02) :104-112
[5]   White paper - Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology [J].
Bates, DW ;
Cohen, M ;
Leape, LL ;
Overhage, JM ;
Shabot, MM ;
Sheridan, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2001, 8 (04) :299-308
[6]   Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality [J].
Bates, DW ;
Kuperman, GJ ;
Wang, S ;
Gandhi, T ;
Kittler, A ;
Volk, L ;
Spurr, C ;
Khorasani, R ;
Tanasijevic, M ;
Middleton, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2003, 10 (06) :523-530
[7]  
Belden J.L., 2009, Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating
[8]   Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Bennett, JW ;
Glasziou, PP .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (05) :217-+
[9]   Electronic technology - A spark to revitalize primary care? [J].
Bodenheimer, T ;
Grumbach, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02) :259-264
[10]  
Bright T J, 2013, Appl Clin Inform, V4, P618, DOI 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0058