The acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Australia and New Zealand

被引:17
作者
Krishnan, Giri [1 ]
Mintz, Jack [1 ]
Foreman, Andrew [1 ]
Hodge, J. C. [1 ]
Krishnan, Suren [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Port Rd, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Robotics; Survey methodology; Otorhinolaryngologic surgical procedures; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Head and neck neoplasms; MICROSURGERY; FEASIBILITY; CURRICULUM; OUTCOMES; SYSTEM; TORS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-018-0856-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) provides improved access to head and neck subsites resulting in well-validated functional and oncological outcomes, but access to and cost of robotic platforms can limit their use. Evidence suggests TORS is increasingly being adopted globally, but there is a paucity of data on the adoption and diffusion of TORS in Australia and New Zealand. A cross-sectional analysis was performed. An online survey was distributed to otolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons through three different Australian and New Zealand specialty membership databases. A 5-point Likert scale based on a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model was incorporated to assess barriers and facilitators to adoption. 77 respondents completed the survey. 43.6% of head and neck surgeons had performed TORS. The most common cases were lateral oropharyngectomy (35.9%), base of tongue resection (33.3%), tongue base mucosectomy (28.2%), supraglottic laryngectomy (15.4%) and TORS for obstructive sleep apnoea (12.8%). Perceived barriers to adoption were high costs, access to and availability of the robotic platform and limited training opportunities. This study provides evidence of adoption of TORS in Australia and New Zealand; however, there is a perception that significant barriers to adoption persist. Results from this study may help guide decisions on how we train and license surgeons in the era of this technology.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: A technical feasibility study using the daVinci surgical robot and an airway mannequin [J].
Hockstein, NG ;
Nolan, JP ;
O'Malley, BW ;
Woo, YJ .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) :780-785
[12]   Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small-volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma [J].
Howard, James ;
Masterson, Liam ;
Dwivedi, Raghav C. ;
Riffat, Faruque ;
Benson, Richard ;
Jefferies, Sarah ;
Jani, Piyush ;
Tysome, James R. ;
Nutting, Chris .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (12)
[13]   Functional outcomes after TORS for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review [J].
Hutcheson, Katherine A. ;
Holsinger, F. Christopher ;
Kupferman, Michael E. ;
Lewin, Jan S. .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 272 (02) :463-471
[14]  
Krishnan S, 2016, ANZ J SURG
[15]   A European Multicenter Study Evaluating the Flex Robotic System in Transoral Robotic Surgery [J].
Lang, Stephan ;
Mattheis, Stefan ;
Hasskamp, Pia ;
Lawson, Georges ;
Gueldner, Christian ;
Mandapathil, Magis ;
Schuler, Patrick ;
Hoffmann, Thomas ;
Scheithauer, Marc ;
Remacle, Marc .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (02) :391-395
[16]  
Liu WS, 2017, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V46, P30
[17]   Flex Robotic System in transoral robotic surgery: The first 40 patients [J].
Mattheis, Stefan ;
Hasskamp, Pia ;
Holtmann, Laura ;
Schaefer, Christina ;
Geisthoff, Urban ;
Dominas, Nina ;
Lang, Stephan .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (03) :471-475
[18]   Long-term Functional and Oncologic Results of Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J].
Moore, Eric J. ;
Olsen, Steven M. ;
Laborde, Rebecca R. ;
Garcia, Joaquin J. ;
Walsh, Francis J. ;
Price, Daniel L. ;
Janus, Jeffrey R. ;
Kasperbauer, Jan L. ;
Olsen, Kerry D. .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 87 (03) :219-225
[19]  
Moore G.A., 1999, Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products
[20]  
Motz K, 2017, JAMA OTOLARYNGOL HEA